Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 24 16:05:58 EST 2015 | alexeis
Hi, The best way is to sort your components for each shape type by expiration date and than by delivery date. This will give exactly what you need to reorganize from lifo to fifo. Best Regards, Alexei
Electronics Forum | Wed Feb 25 09:19:39 EST 2015 | swiese242
We currently do have part system in place. The problem that we are having is finding the same part used on multiple jobs. We it be sufficient to keep most used and common parts on hand. Then turn kitting into fifo.
Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 26 09:18:46 EST 2015 | swiese242
We have an older version of DBA and are currently looking into Next GEN DBA. I would like more insight to how other manufactures handle their inventory, whether a FIFO or kitting process. Thanks.
Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 24 16:11:15 EST 2015 | emeto
I assume you have a part number system. If so, you should kit the reel with less parts first from the same part number. If you don't use part number system, then you probably have components sorted by value and size, which should lead to the same pri
Electronics Forum | Wed Feb 25 11:42:29 EST 2015 | emeto
What software do you use to track your parts? We use Manex - it is not perfect but still gives you the opportunity to track parts/jobs relations. For example I know in each moment one particular part goes to 5 currently open jobs. You should explore
Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 24 15:52:58 EST 2015 | swiese242
We currently have around 20k+ components in stock. I would like to have some opinions on creating a more lean manufacturing system. We check stock in our system and then order parts. Most of time leading to employees looking for parts, or shorts. We
Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 26 14:47:19 EST 2015 | superlen
unique mnf/mnf part number. - Be meticulous on maintaining your WO Boms. Train your employees to not circumnavigate keeping the WOBOM accurate to what they kitted/placed on the board. If you keep the one to one part number relationship above this is
Electronics Forum | Tue May 12 10:03:12 EDT 2009 | daan_terstegge
Hi All, I see more and more components like QFN or LGA with bottom-only terminations,with landpatterns getting finer all the time. I have no ppm-figures of our process, but based on a benchmark study by Agilent I'd say that 500 ppm is a decent value
Electronics Forum | Mon Mar 17 03:50:12 EDT 2008 | Sean
Hi All, Besides the above question, I have another one as below: (1) How frequent that we need to perform strain gauge study on ICT, Functional test fixture? Is it a necessary to perform this study each time after ICT, Funtional test fixture preve
Electronics Forum | Sat Sep 03 14:39:32 EDT 2011 | christian01976
Hello. We use an Assembléon MC24 (similar to the Yamaha YS24, the fast version of the YS12) and I can say it is a really good machine. Low maintenance and a good userfriendly software. We run our MC24 with 35.000 cph. And the machine is really small.
