Electronics Forum | Mon Feb 19 17:34:02 EST 2007 | GS
Thank You Pavel and Dave, Unfortunately I do not have IPC-4554. Anyway I 0.6-1.0umm is what I remember, and confirmed by reading also through leterature available on google. I was just going to understand if it possible to obtain more thickness
Electronics Forum | Fri Sep 12 13:14:33 EDT 2003 | Mark Kostinovsky
A little adition to Norm's statement: Sn-Pb intermettalic compounds do not accept solder as they are (even without being oxidized).
Electronics Forum | Mon May 18 13:18:25 EDT 1998 | Chrys
I'm reviewing my board fab spec. It calls for a minimum SnPb thickness of 50 microinches on HASL PWB's. I've looked at other specs that call out anything from 30 to 80 microinches, and others that just say the copper pad must be covered and soldera
Electronics Forum | Fri Sep 12 09:10:23 EDT 2003 | Norm Morikawa
Around 1989 I had this probelmm with a SMT CCA that would not solder in one area consistently. I had it cross sectioned by the bare board supplier and found that under their metallurgical microscope the thickness of this HASL bare board could not be
Electronics Forum | Wed Nov 17 10:03:29 EST 2010 | scottp
Instead of a minimum thickness, we require no exposed copper or SnCu intermetallic. We've been having a lot of trouble lately with suppliers of SN100 HASL boards giving us pads with very irregular solder deposits with areas of exposed intermetallic.
Electronics Forum | Mon May 18 20:57:06 EDT 1998 | Earl Moon
.025" pitch so the only problem we run into is too much HASL on the adhesive side causing improper glue dispense. | As Earl keeps saying HASL thickness is hard to impossible to control. I think we need to look hard at OSP's again but then you get in
Electronics Forum | Mon May 18 22:54:04 EDT 1998 | Dave F
.025" pitch so the only problem we run into is too much HASL on the adhesive side causing improper glue dispense. | | As Earl keeps saying HASL thickness is hard to impossible to control. I think we need to look hard at OSP's again but then you get
Electronics Forum | Fri Nov 22 16:19:45 EST 2019 | davef
I'd guess ... + Pads have no solder mask, clear or otherwise. + Pads won't take solder, because you're trying to solder to nickel. + Nickel on the pads is oxidized and is sticking out its tongue at the flux you're using. + Something went south
Electronics Forum | Mon May 18 13:30:15 EDT 1998 | Earl Moon
| I'm reviewing my board fab spec. It calls for a minimum SnPb thickness of 50 microinches on HASL PWB's. I've looked at other specs that call out anything from 30 to 80 microinches, and others that just say the copper pad must be covered and solde
Electronics Forum | Thu May 21 09:54:07 EDT 1998 | Justin Medernach
| I'm reviewing my board fab spec. It calls for a minimum SnPb thickness of 50 microinches on HASL PWB's. I've looked at other specs that call out anything from 30 to 80 microinches, and others that just say the copper pad must be covered and solde
.gif)
