Electronics Forum | Wed Aug 18 21:10:23 EDT 1999 | se
| | | Hi, | | | I'd like to ask some tips about the merits and shortcomings o | | | of both screen printer and stencil printer. For small quantity and highly mixed usage, which type of printer is suitable to our | | | application? | | | The board
Electronics Forum | Wed Aug 18 17:59:09 EDT 1999 | Mik Horvath
| | Hi, | | I'd like to ask some tips about the merits and shortcomings o | | of both screen printer and stencil printer. For small quantity and highly mixed usage, which type of printer is suitable to our | | application? | | The boards contain
Electronics Forum | Wed Aug 18 18:10:33 EDT 1999 | Mik Horvath
| | Hi, | | I'd like to ask some tips about the merits and shortcomings o | | of both screen printer and stencil printer. For small quantity and highly mixed usage, which type of printer is suitable to our | | application? | | The boards contain
Electronics Forum | Fri Sep 21 10:56:38 EDT 2001 | davef
Not as such. Look at IPC-7525 �Stencil Design Guidelines� The issues are: area and aspect ratios. They relate the size of the aperture opening to the thickness of the stencil. Check the fine SMTnet Archives for guidelines.
Electronics Forum | Thu Dec 16 15:00:20 EST 2004 | glaucon
Simple differences. Both processes require a very similar machine platform, controlled motion, vision fiducial recognition and alignment of a substrate (PCB or hybrid ceramic) to the "image", the image being either a stencil (hence stencil printing)
Electronics Forum | Wed Aug 18 15:20:25 EDT 1999 | John Thorup
| Hi, | I'd like to ask some tips about the merits and shortcomings o | of both screen printer and stencil printer. For small quantity and highly mixed usage, which type of printer is suitable to our | application? | The boards contain no BGA and
Electronics Forum | Fri Apr 20 15:27:00 EDT 2001 | jimlew
We do some aperture reductions - but it's not the 10% i'm accustomed to. Looks like it should be more than we currently do (I think we do 10% of length, but no width). Don't think we have a slumping problem, and we're not doing snap-off, only contact
Electronics Forum | Fri Apr 20 11:05:23 EDT 2001 | gcs
Just a bullet! My results are, .005" stencil thickness should measure between .0055" - .006" if your pressure is correct, metal blades and snap-off is set up correctly. Do you have aperture reductions at the QFP locations "typicial industry standard
Electronics Forum | Fri Apr 20 08:41:56 EDT 2001 | jimlew
For those of you out there, like myself who are still using 2-d to measure paste ht, I have 2 questions. 1. Typically, what tolerance are you applying to your ht? +- 1 mil, or what? 2. Are you using metal squeegees, and if so, have you found that squ
Electronics Forum | Mon Oct 15 12:42:36 EDT 2001 | davef
I hate getting "roped" into math stuff, but here I go again ... Area of aperture = volume of paste / stencil thickness = {[5000 mil^3] / 5 mil} = 1000 mil^2 Side of the square aperture = Sqrt of the area = [1000 mil^2]^1/2 = 32 mil Diameter of ape