Electronics Forum | Sat Jun 04 01:39:39 EDT 2005 | adlsmt
It would appear that pure tin is backward compatible with leaded processes. This makes it a great finish, as if you migrate all your parts over time there is no issue mixing them. I am not aware of any finish that eliminates the possibility of tin wh
Electronics Forum | Mon Dec 08 19:44:20 EST 1997 | Richard
Hello, I am just getting into the SM world. I am finding conflicting information on the different types of assembly. I was originally understanding that Type I was pure SM, Type II was a mix of SM and TH, with variations, and Type III was pure TH. Is
Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 02 08:30:32 EDT 2008 | interflux_electronics
Why not follow SAC305? you would do so for any other component finish wouldn't you? A component finish of pure Sn would also not call for a pure Sn profile, would it?
Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 14 11:35:09 EDT 2008 | stepheniii
NASA won't allow a pure tin finish in space. Any part with a pure tin finish must be recoated.
Electronics Forum | Thu Aug 14 14:01:03 EDT 2003 | Andrea
I was recently given a copy of the "Tin Whisker Agency Action Notice" I was then asked to recommend and implement a action to prevent the suseptible components from reaching our stockroom. Since I can not commit my personel to activly research which
Electronics Forum | Fri Jun 03 16:40:48 EDT 2005 | Andrea
I have a customer who has put a restriction against pure tin finish components. We have gotten our BOMs compliant with all but 5 parts. Fairchild p/n FDD6512A, FQD12N20C, IRLM120A Bournes 3214G-1-501E Sprague 10TS-D10 I am looking for a standard pr
Electronics Forum | Sat Jun 04 21:02:48 EDT 2005 | adlsmt
Sorry Dave, I meant lead free finishes.
Electronics Forum | Sun Jun 05 08:45:44 EDT 2005 | davef
There is none. That's why aerospace is exempt.
Electronics Forum | Mon Mar 01 15:28:30 EST 2010 | mikesewell
Pure tin finish? Tin whiskers?
