Electronics Forum | Sat Jan 14 13:18:37 EST 2006 | mrduckmann2000
Let's think about this, there former filed service engineers. I bet they got out of field becasue of being laid-off. Typically the NON-Performers are the first to go. Hint hint.....former field engineers! Quad 4C's when they were new to the marke
Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 24 09:33:45 EDT 2011 | bobpan
An old quad 2C/4C with a workholder will probably fit all those numbers. 2Ft is pretty long though and that might be a little too long. Machine price range is about right. Programming is pretty easy. Good luck
Electronics Forum | Thu Jun 03 20:15:23 EDT 2004 | Ken
My Machine guy was a 4 year ex-quad Service Engineer. Prior to that he spent 6 years in a CM programming and servicing quads from QX toQ3c/4c q100 series. These are opinions. Nothing more. I have noticed that the smallest players in the market
Electronics Forum | Wed Jun 02 17:11:48 EDT 2004 | bpan
Quad 4c's would be a great machine for what you are looking for. They are easy to learn for an smt machine and very reliable. Just realize that when you buy a machine that is no longer being improved...you can run into limitations. Those machines are
Electronics Forum | Fri Jun 04 00:51:15 EDT 2004 | fastek
Ken...you are right on the money. I couldn't imagine someone new to SMT assembly getting themselves involved with such an old platform. Besides I would have my doubts that a Quad 4C can even handle what this guy would want it to do. 0402's on a 20 ye
Electronics Forum | Tue Jun 08 22:20:17 EDT 2004 | Don
Dr. Lou, I wouldn't recommend the Quad QSP series. A stated before it's old tech, and the feeders are junk. If your looking at Tyco (Quad), they have a new Mirae 1025P platform. It's very competitive performance/price against Assembleon and the li
Electronics Forum | Thu May 28 21:13:09 EDT 1998 | skhun
| Our company is currently looking to implement a SMT production line. What I am looking for is feedback on people's experiences with various machines. | Here's what we are in the market for: | Low/Mid volume 3,000+cph machine that can handle high j
Electronics Forum | Wed Aug 01 09:36:17 EDT 2001 | Pete Barton
Jay, > > I agree with your assement and Chips on > the Quads. I once worked at a shop that had Quads > and DynaPerts(at the time) The perts were > slower(TIME) and required(EFFORT/PEOPLE) more > MAINTENANCE(more effort more people and more > re
Electronics Forum | Wed Feb 24 14:19:24 EST 2021 | marcelorotofrance
I am completely aware about the lack of kilos, other goodies and buggy software. I scratch my head when I read that they claim that they can do 0201 with belt drives and without linear encoders. In my personal opinion a KE family Juki would be perfec
Electronics Forum | Fri Feb 18 20:37:14 EST 2022 | dwl
0402 imperial? all those machines should be able to handle that. Even an old Quad 4C can place those. As others have said, availability of parts in your area will be the issue.
1 |