Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 25 18:49:53 EST 2010 | dcell_1t
Why don't you use OEE (or OLE for the whole line) where you will involve downtime (availability), performance and quality rate. We're currently using this metric for our SMT lines, if you need info just let me know.
Electronics Forum | Thu Oct 27 16:47:55 EDT 2011 | sjs2303
Has anyone any experience with using the latest version of this software? If so I am interested in hearing how you use it to reflect the different metrics for quality reports.
Electronics Forum | Fri Oct 16 13:35:39 EDT 1998 | Steve Herring
| We have just recently started using the Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) metric on our SMT lines. This measurement is the "equivalent percentage of time the equipment is being used to produce saleable product at the maximum machine rate." Th
Electronics Forum | Fri Oct 16 07:54:55 EDT 1998 | Mike Demos
We have just recently started using the Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) metric on our SMT lines. This measurement is the "equivalent percentage of time the equipment is being used to produce saleable product at the maximum machine rate." The
Electronics Forum | Mon Oct 19 23:02:21 EDT 1998 | john godfrey
| We have just recently started using the Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) metric on our SMT lines. This measurement is the "equivalent percentage of time the equipment is being used to produce saleable product at the maximum machine rate." Th
Electronics Forum | Tue Nov 15 07:40:13 EST 2016 | robl
1) Look at who is actually franchised to sell the manufacturer in your region, cross check with MFG website. You can buy non-franchised, but if something goes wrong don't expect the local guys to help. 2) Do your engineers/customers need technical s
Electronics Forum | Sat Mar 13 10:42:45 EST 2010 | davef
Manuel: What is the objective of OEE? It seems to say it's OK to give-up 4% of your quality, if you can increase your machine speed by 5%. Does it work on machines that are not capacity constrained?
Electronics Forum | Sun Mar 14 00:15:45 EST 2010 | dcell_1t
Well, not really... the index does not say much by itself, as you say, you can improve your cycle time by 5% but if you don't update the product rate in your calculation, then you're not providing accurate data so your performance is going to be high
Electronics Forum | Mon Mar 01 09:14:00 EST 1999 | Jules Winfield
| I'm trying to get a feel for what the industry is doing with regards to collecting assembly defect data in the SMT/PWA process. Is it sampling or 100%? What are the points within the process where critical assembly defect data is collected. We run
Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 21 13:48:32 EDT 2003 | davef
ISO 9001-1994 and ISO 9001-2000 are significantly different regarding 'process'. In the 1994 version, processes were considered to be routine manufacturing processes [eg, drill a hole]. In the new ISO, a 'process' is more global and covers anything
.gif)
