Electronics Forum | Sun Feb 18 14:46:11 EST 2001 | CAL
Some key data is needed 1) how often does the HS 50 machines run? 24/7? 2)How many placements are being performed? I know for a fact Siemens Siplace S/F platforms require weekly preventative maintenance. Knowing the sophistication of the HS platform
Electronics Forum | Tue Sep 21 12:04:02 EDT 2004 | russ
I would lose focus on European machines. I have used several european placement machines and frankly I think that they are garbage. The machines have been poorly designed for Preventative maintenance, replacement parts are expensive and slow to get,
Electronics Forum | Tue Sep 21 12:10:45 EDT 2004 | Rob
Nope, I agree Russ. (Except for Siemens being garbage - there's a lot worse out there!) We run Fuji CP6E's and they are bombproof.
Electronics Forum | Tue Sep 21 11:22:20 EDT 2004 | rlackey
Hi Arvydas, Do you want a machine specified at 20K per hour or to run at 20K per hour? Regarding Chipshooters I've worked with Siemens, Philips FCM's, Fuji's, Panasonics & Sanyo/Universal and the best in terms of reliabilty by a long way were the J
Electronics Forum | Thu Sep 23 10:48:21 EDT 2004 | Mke
Hi, My experience in the past has been predominantly with Fuji, Universal and Siemens. I categorise each of these systems in different ways; 1) If I want bombproof reliability - I Choose fuji. There tough mechanical design ensures operation time
Electronics Forum | Thu Sep 23 14:46:11 EDT 2004 | ricardof
Agree with MKE, some reconditioned CP6 machines would be fine for you if you want bombproof equipment and low operation cost, but no flexibilty at all, unless you have small assys with few part numbers, If you want more felxibility, GSMs are OK, easy
Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 06 11:07:43 EST 2001 | cjrjmj
I am looking for some assistance with placement accuracy studies for chipshooters(Fuji CP4-Cp642) and platform machines (GSM all configurations, Siemens HS50/S25). I would like some information on companies and recommendations on process of evaluatin
Electronics Forum | Tue Sep 07 21:30:24 EDT 2004 | peter016
I would like to know what are the achievable chip placement per hour for the following chipmounter models. 1. Siemens HS50 (Spec at 50,000 chips per hour) 2. Siemens Siplace S20 3. Fuji CP 642 4. Sanyo TCM1050 5. Universal HSP4975(re-badge of TCM3000
Electronics Forum | Mon Nov 27 16:31:07 EST 2000 | Chris Jackson
I am evaluating several pieces of Siemens equipment and would like to get some input from industry users. I am seeing that Siemens is able to meet cycle time estimates and thus throughput. I am concerned about the robustness?? Any input is welcome. T
winsouce.jpg)