Electronics Forum: ssop28 (Page 1 of 1)

IP1 and SSOP28

Electronics Forum | Fri May 21 17:36:39 EDT 2010 | m79d

Hi Fujispares thanks for the info but still not going. Tried other ic parts and the result is the same. Also tried another vision board. Any more suggestions? Thanks

IP1 and SSOP28

Electronics Forum | Tue May 18 16:40:22 EDT 2010 | m79d

I am having some problems getting the IP1 to place a SSOP28 package,pitch 0.65mm lead width 0.3mm. I am selecting computer vision 012 (tried 011) and vision type 100. EL data was put in looking at the datasheet and also measuring the device. Have tri

Costing new products - Qty of solder paste

Electronics Forum | Wed Aug 16 03:04:50 EDT 2000 | rberry

Hi Does anyone have a tried and tested method of estimating the mass of solder paste that will be used for an SMD assembly given only the type and quantity of components used. (As well as type of paste, stencil thickness etc) In other words is there


Electronics Forum | Fri Aug 11 16:19:39 EDT 2006 | T. Oaks

Hi, We have a issue with current leakage between pins on an SSOP 28 in a low frequency RF application and there is a suspicion that it is being caused by something in the flux residue. We have had the bad boards analyzed and a 'high' Chloride level w

IP1 and SSOP28

Electronics Forum | Sun May 23 21:33:42 EDT 2010 | ashley

"The part is picked up and head goes to it's xy location" Hello mickd, I believe VP had passed but machine is confused how to compensate & place. OS error normally associate with a faulty VME card. Please check the following :- VM1152 VM1730 VM193

IP1 and SSOP28

Electronics Forum | Tue May 18 21:43:02 EDT 2010 | ashley

Hello mickd, 1) The EL data & Vision_type is NOT necessary when using MCS30 for IP1 machine. note : your input of the above might have cause confusion during VP, hence the OS error. 2) I would suggest the following... 2a) lower the Lead_check_are

Component Database and Placement List

Electronics Forum | Mon Oct 23 06:50:06 EDT 2017 | spoiltforchoice

For package shapes/names I would recommend using manufacturer names. This is much safer than coming up with descriptive names like QFN32_5x5 as there are multiple 5mm 32Pin QFN shapes even when pitch is the same, this makes it safer to use a name in


ssop28 searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information