Electronics Forum | Thu May 17 09:00:51 EDT 2007 | bsteffen
Since your budget is between 25 and 30K I would say you have plenty of options. Electrovert and Vitronics are both good solid machines. Seho is another option. Seho is extremely user frendly and maintenance freindly and easy to profile however, it is
Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 06 12:45:28 EDT 1999 | JohnW
| I've heard that use of VOC free flux with wavesolder fixtures can be challenging due to entrapment of water in the fixture. | | Is anyone out there successfully running VOC free with wave fixtures & did you experience problems? If so, how did you
Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 06 13:02:41 EDT 1999 | John Thorup
| | I've heard that use of VOC free flux with wavesolder fixtures can be challenging due to entrapment of water in the fixture. | | | | Is anyone out there successfully running VOC free with wave fixtures & did you experience problems? If so, how d
Electronics Forum | Wed Oct 12 11:19:46 EDT 2005 | patrickbruneel
Yeah, adopting is the right word. In this new lead-free era spec.'s are made to stay within the scoop of the RoHS directive. The driving force for spec.'s should be reliability. Did you see any impurity level spec.'s yet in wave soldering for Cu, Au,
Electronics Forum | Tue Jun 20 20:43:00 EDT 2000 | Dave F
Gary: Your flux supplier is the person for you to ask this question. For instance, the Lonco Superflo 26F that Jason was talking about last week has a preheat of 85�C to 110�C. * Thickness and number of layers of your board will affect you choice o
Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 06 12:21:38 EDT 1999 | Kelly Morris
I've heard that use of VOC free flux with wavesolder fixtures can be challenging due to entrapment of water in the fixture. Is anyone out there successfully running VOC free with wave fixtures & did you experience problems? If so, how did you resol
Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 08 19:10:09 EST 2005 | DasonC
Lead free is not define as NO lead and "a maximum concentration value of 0.1% by weight in homogeneous materials for lead shall be tolerated." Check below link. So replaced your solder from the pot when exceed 0.1%. http://www.leadfree.org/files
Electronics Forum | Fri Aug 25 09:15:43 EDT 2006 | russ
We use a single large pad on board and reduce stencil aperture 50%. If you mask/reduce the thermal pad the solder will not wet out to edges and you will still see the part standoff with the open joints. the purpose of reduction is to wet the paste
Electronics Forum | Sun Nov 27 05:04:02 EST 2016 | pmcg
Never used stainless pots as when we converted to lead free we changed all the pots to titanium. Been using SN100C for many years now, very good results, also use it in reel form in our selective solder machines with great results. Bear in mind the
Electronics Forum | Thu Dec 01 04:32:28 EST 2016 | Rob
We've run for about 2 years with SN100C on a Stainless pot, and all looking OK at the moment - we have just drained the pot and swapped to a similar solder (customer request)so we had a good look as we were interested to see what was happening. To be
