Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 09 08:29:10 EDT 2002 | r_sturdevant
I agree with others here who have questioned the amount of solder and reliability of the joint when using this aperture shape. I have had experience with these with MELFS, and the main issue I've seen comes when cleaning the stencil - all those littl
Electronics Forum | Fri Sep 09 11:37:27 EDT 2005 | ???
Try home-plated the stencil apertures, and make "V" shape home-plated outside edges of two pads instead of between two pads.
Electronics Forum | Thu Aug 05 11:51:44 EDT 1999 | Wolfgang Busko
| | | | | | | | | | | | Hello, | | | If you are using no-clean and they are entrapped in the flux it is also IPC accepted but i havent found a customer yet who agrees with that. Im sure you have checked your profile. I had the same problem with chi
Electronics Forum | Fri Sep 09 14:03:06 EDT 2005 | Mei
Nomorely the V-shape home-plated apertures look like two opening mouth facing each other. But this time just opposite way. And make 30% home-plated. Hope you can understand.
Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 07 10:59:11 EST 2002 | pjc
IPC-7525 "Stencil Design Guidelines" is a good reference document to have. Here are notes from a Tessera, (a major mBGA mfg.), study- "Application Note Solder Stencil Requirement for mBGA" The stencil aperture is to be square, equal in size to the l
Electronics Forum | Mon Oct 21 23:48:13 EDT 2002 | harris
Hi: If anyone have the experience with the PCB pad design and stencil design for the uBGA? We meet the problem for it. The component data is 0.3mm diameter and 0.5 pitch. Could anyone tell me the PCB pad dimension, the stencil type and aperture dimes
Electronics Forum | Mon Aug 28 17:54:59 EDT 2000 | Steve Thomas
We're trying out 0603 packages on some 0805 footprints (at this stage only on some test boards) since our vendor tells us the 0805's are going to be getting harder to get, and more expensive to pay for. I understand the IPC footprint for the two is
Electronics Forum | Thu Aug 05 08:39:26 EDT 1999 | Wayne Sanita
| | | Hello, If you are using no-clean and they are entrapped in the flux it is also IPC accepted but i havent found a customer yet who agrees with that. Im sure you have checked your profile. I had the same problem with chip components but after c
Electronics Forum | Thu Aug 05 10:55:09 EDT 1999 | Wolfgang Busko
| | | | | | Hello, | If you are using no-clean and they are entrapped in the flux it is also IPC accepted but i havent found a customer yet who agrees with that. Im sure you have checked your profile. I had the same problem with chip components but
Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 10 09:13:15 EST 2005 | davef
From http://www.IPC.org ... IPC-7351 - Generic Requirements for Surface Mount Land Pattern and Design Standard The successor to the IPC-SM-782A is here! The document covers land pattern design for all types of passive and active components, includ
