Electronics Forum | Fri Nov 07 03:50:05 EST 2003 | chrissieneale
Rocky, i would be interested, do you want to email me them direct?
Electronics Forum | Tue Apr 06 14:44:50 EDT 2004 | davef
Chris Search the SMTnet Archives to get started. There's a fair amount of background there.
Electronics Forum | Wed Sep 13 22:29:10 EDT 2006 | davef
attrition
Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 23 22:59:30 EDT 2007 | fastek
Couldn't agree more Old Dude
Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 06 10:55:58 EST 2001 | pjc
Larry, Our specification is 0.075% for our Fuji CP3 and IP2 machines. At or above that figure the Maintenance Dept. has to get to work. We typically see 0.03% to 0.05% on average. The Fuji machines are all vision centering. We have found feeders are
Electronics Forum | Mon Dec 23 13:44:46 EST 2002 | Paul Black
Does anyone have a tried-and-true method to account for machine losses of SMT parts? I remember reading an article once that stated that 5% - 10% of components of certain sizes are known to be lost during placement, and I know some CM's overplan by 5
Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 28 09:33:34 EDT 2003 | chrissieneale
This may be a really silly question but does anyone pick up and hand place the reject parts from the scrap bins of the machine? My attrition rates are out of control and i think this would not only highlight the problem but also save oodles of money
Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 17 21:58:42 EST 2012 | jorge_quijano
Hello guys I hope you can help me, I had worked with machines that usually tell you how many components are dropped off, now I have some very old machines without such information, any idea how to measure if attrition rates are normal? I expect to be
Electronics Forum | Wed Feb 15 10:37:19 EST 2012 | caerleon
The only way you will be able to measure it is to count the reel before you put it on the machine, count them when they come off and deduct the amount expected to be placed. you will then have the result of attrition on the machine. or.. Pick the p
Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 28 11:37:30 EDT 2003 | terrapinstation
Chrissie, There is no "silly" question. It seems to me that, not with standing the issues highlighted in your posting, notably - risks, time, etc.. Your time would be much better spent determining the reason for the reject. If your placement equip
