Electronics Forum | Fri Sep 07 14:09:57 EDT 2001 | aqueous
Hi Carol, Pressure requirements have changed over the past few years. In the recent past, aqueous cleaning systems relied on high flow, low pressure �flooding� techniques. 20 � 30 PSI pumped through large orifice nozzles. With ever increasing boa
Electronics Forum | Tue Apr 13 20:57:14 EDT 2004 | Mike Konrad
Hey Dreamy, Dave is correct. If you attempt to clean your water soluble (OA) flux with water only, you will turn the no-clean flux white. No inspector or end-user will accept this. If a proper cleaning system is not available to you, then I would
Electronics Forum | Thu Sep 06 10:34:21 EDT 2001 | Mike Konrad
Hi Jeff, Sean is correct. Although ultrasonic technology will work in post-reflow de-fluxing applications, you will receive concerns regarding ultrasonic �damage� to wire bonded components. Much has been written to combat this belief but the conce
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 26 21:02:48 EST 2002 | Mike Konrad
There are two basic technologies to choose from: 1. Ultrasonic 2. Spray-in-air Makers of ultrasonic stencils include: Aqueous Technologies (that�s us): http://www.aqueoustech.com PMR: http://www.pmrsystems.com JNJ Industries: http://www.jnj-
Electronics Forum | Fri Dec 08 21:26:44 EST 2006 | billwestiet
You already have some good answers. A chemical isolation zone for RMA is a good idea. If you are looking for new see the two references you have and Austin America. If you are looking for used, see us at http://www.ietechnology.net. We presently
