Full Site - : chem (Page 7 of 13)

Re:Plating defects-Electroless Electroplating problem

Electronics Forum | Fri Nov 19 10:56:03 EST 1999 | Kol Chokrotti

chem. Clean ->Electroless Cu ->Clean (hot air)->Electroplating->Inspection. We have checked chemicals, possible contamination and plating current requirements for that specific program�. Everything seems all right. Appreciate if someone could give

20 mil qfp bridging

Electronics Forum | Thu Aug 12 18:43:49 EDT 1999 | Wayne S.

Hello Having a problem with bridging on 20mil pitch qfp, only on the lead groups where squeegee goes over width of apertures. Using MPM sp-200 semi-auto, chem-etch stencil, 9-10mil width opening 100 durometer blade. Getting "tails" on deposits. Trie

Re: 20 mil qfp bridging

Electronics Forum | Thu Aug 12 20:17:12 EDT 1999 | Kelly Morris

| Hello | | Having a problem with bridging on 20mil pitch qfp, only on the lead groups where squeegee goes over width of apertures. Using MPM sp-200 semi-auto, chem-etch stencil, 9-10mil width opening | 100 durometer blade. Getting "tails" on deposi

Re: Stenciling

Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 23 09:55:33 EST 1999 | Dan Hughes

| Al, | | In general, I would agree with Justin and Scott, with the exception that I don't feel a laser cut stencil is required when printing 25 and 20 or even 16 mil pitch. We make a good chem etch stencil that will print fine pitch great if you ev

Re: What are the disadvantages of Paper Phernaulic besides its' spelling

Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 25 18:29:48 EST 1999 | Karl

| Fab Gurus, (Earl) | What are the disadvantages of using paper phrenwhatsit as a substrate. I want to justify changing a substrate from paper to chem3 or FR4 and I need some info regarding long term failure issues, etc. | | Thanks, | Justin | Ther

Water Jet Stencil Cut

Electronics Forum | Mon Oct 03 14:14:06 EDT 2005 | Carmichael

My findings were that it wasn't accurate enough to create the crisp aperatures needed for release. That was almost ten years ago when everyone was looking for an alternative to chem-etch however. Water guided laser also showed promise of doing this b

Re: paste release from stencil, and volume calculation

Electronics Forum | Sat Nov 13 14:09:45 EST 1999 | se

First, let me say what I always say: a good chem-etched stencil will print fine pitch. Chem-etch brings trap to the side walls because its a physical by-product of the process. Because they are less expensive you can add electropolish and still save

Re: MicroBGA printing problem

Electronics Forum | Thu Sep 23 12:47:48 EDT 1999 | Earl Moon

| | | I've had some trouble pasting a test board for a MicroBGA trial. Most of the paste remains in the stencil apertures. | | | The stencil is 6 mil thick, laser cut and electo-polished. | | | The apertures are 12 mil in diameter with 20 mil pitch.

Re: Laser Cut Stencils

Electronics Forum | Thu Apr 01 22:21:45 EST 1999 | Dave F

| We make an excellent chem-etch stencil. Our customers have had success printing 16 mil pitch without a problem. This is not an advertisement! | | When we try to sell our product to new customers, we find more and more people willing to pay more fo

Re: Electropolishing Laser-Cut Stencils

Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 15 12:22:57 EDT 1998 | Steve Moore

Electropolishing definitely improves the print characteristics of both Laser-cut and Chem-etch stencils. The caveat here is avoid over polishing which results in rounding of the edges and/or enlargement of the openings. Over polishing is typically th


chem searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information