Full Site - : comb test (Page 2 of 4)

GE 200 230 3800

New Equipment | Components

DS3000-140A  MONITOR ASSEMBLY  DS3000140A81492506  GE SPEEDTRONIC / GE DRIVE SYSTEMS  DS3000A-140A  CRT MODULE  DS303A0XAC03XH  DC CONTACTOR  DS303A2A0XAC03XH  DC CONTACTOR  DS303A2C0A021XH  CONTACTOR  DS303A3C0XA003XN  GE CONTACT DC SIZE 3 2P NO. EX

zhengzhou yuzhe electronic technology co.,ltd

SIR Testing

Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 04 02:31:55 EDT 2006 | Mustang

Calling for an input from the Experts our there. Our customer is questioning the cleanliness of the no-clean product that we produced for them. We were asked to clean the board (localised cleaning) after rework (IC need to be changed due to an up re

Re: No-Clean Paste Lab Test Evaluations

Electronics Forum | Sat Feb 14 19:35:51 EST 1998 | C. Lao

Mr Lao We have some specialist knowledge on this subject and offer both equipment and services for these tests. My first recommendation is that take coupons manufactured by your PC Fabricator and then samples at each manufacturing stage: Bare coupon

No-Clean Solder

Electronics Forum | Mon Mar 05 15:29:50 EST 2007 | ck_the_flip

When no-clean flux and no-clean soldering first came out in the late 80's / early 90's, there were lots of White Papers written about conformal coating adhesion and no-clean flux. I'm pretty sure all CC's will adhere to today's chemistries. To be o

OSP and SIR

Electronics Forum | Wed Aug 21 17:44:32 EDT 2002 | davef

Splitting hairs, I expect SIR of all solderability protection, including OSP, to decrease after reflow. What�s more, I expect the SIR of all solderability protection to pretty much decrease over time. The �comb pattern� test specimens meet requirem

Approach To Contamination Testing Of PCBs

Electronics Forum | Thu May 14 14:48:45 EDT 1998 | Dave F

We understand that testing for ionic contamination and surface insulation resistance measure different properties. We assemble printed circuit boards for other companies. We will not get combs on 90% of the boards that we assemble. We have no custo

SIR Testing

Electronics Forum | Thu Jul 06 16:00:11 EDT 2006 | samir

Ionic Cleanliness Testing: IPC-TM-650, Test Method 2.3.25, Section 5, "Dynamic Extraction Method", is the most commonplace method in the industry to test YOUR PCBA's for cleanliness. Run it through your process as normal, and send it out for testin

SIR Testing

Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 04 08:04:37 EDT 2006 | davef

The heat from a soldering iron will push raw flux across the surface of the board and into surprising places. It's bad practice to squirt liquid low residue flux on the board during rework, because the portion of the flux that does not get heated pr

Re: Approach To Contamination Testing Of PCBs

Electronics Forum | Fri May 15 10:51:12 EDT 1998 | Justin Medernach

| We understand that testing for ionic contamination and surface insulation resistance measure different properties. We assemble printed circuit boards for other companies. We will not get combs on 90% of the boards that we assemble. | We have no c

Aye aye aye.

Electronics Forum | Fri May 15 12:01:34 EDT 1998 | Justin

| | We understand that testing for ionic contamination and surface insulation resistance measure different properties. We assemble printed circuit boards for other companies. We will not get combs on 90% of the boards that we assemble. | | We have


comb test searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information