Electronics Forum | Sat Dec 04 09:42:18 EST 1999 | Chris McDonald
Just as explained in a follow-up you are getting too much paste on the pad. The pad is probably the right size but you cant have your aperature the same size as your pad. What we have done is put a Cross in the stencil. This will reduce the paste and
Electronics Forum | Mon Dec 06 17:50:39 EST 1999 | Kantesh Doss
Christopher: Thank you for sharing your experience about the DPAK. Yes, out part has a heat sink at the bottom. Our stencil opening was 7 mils (in both X and Y) smaller than the pad size excepting that the stencil opening consisted of a series of zeb
Electronics Forum | Sat Dec 04 09:23:20 EST 1999 | Christopher Lampron
Kantesh, Does this particular part have a heat sink across the bottom side of the component and does your pad size and stencil aperture match the component? I have just had a very similar problem with a DPAK. What we found was that the recomended pad
Electronics Forum | Fri Dec 10 10:25:59 EST 1999 | Wolfgang Busko
Hi Larry, you might find something looking for the thread "D-Pak misalignment Problem - Kantesh Doss 23:43:23 12/02/1999" Good luck Wolfgang
Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 09 14:47:39 EDT 2014 | deanm
I'm looking for a typical SMT placement defect rate from others in the field so I can judge whether or not we are in an acceptable range. If I give you a board with 200 components (0603, 0805, SOICs, 20mil MSOPs, tantalums, DPAKs and a few 20mil fin
