Electronics Forum | Tue Jun 28 13:32:35 EDT 2011 | jax
I started with Dual Beam, 7 spindle, Genesis machines. (first in 2003) - Still runs good Speed was not my main concern... Odd Form, Tall components were. I added High Speed with the Lightning Head machines. (first in 2005) - Still runs Good I am not
Electronics Forum | Wed May 02 12:22:30 EDT 2007 | SWAG
Make sure you get a good upward looking camera combo. 4.0 on rear and 2.6 for PTF (platform tray feeder) parts is my favorite. Easy to wrench on, calibrate (if you have a cal. kit), and easy to program. Single beam will run at 2000+ cph and dual b
Electronics Forum | Tue Jun 28 11:45:27 EDT 2011 | jax
I have multiple machines consisting of a mix of the following: Single beam Lightning head machines (Advantis, Lead Screw) Dual Beam Seven Spindle machines (Genesis, Linear Drive) Single Beam Seven Spindle Machines Advantis, Lead Screw) The vintage ra
Electronics Forum | Tue Aug 31 09:31:37 EDT 2004 | gregp
The 22,000 cph is for the dual beam machine (C5d), which is in production now alongside our single beam machine. They are built on the same frame and share many assemblies. In fact we only show rendered images of both machines. This is to show the
Electronics Forum | Wed Sep 22 16:27:47 EDT 2004 | gregp
JB, First of all thank you for the "great salesman" compliment. And thank you for bringing up this wonderful thread because the more people that read it the better. I don't mean to make you look foolish (or maybe I do) but perhaps you should take a
Electronics Forum | Wed Jan 17 13:33:23 EST 2007 | slthomas
We're in the process of trying to select a rebuilt, refurbished, or well serviced flexible placer, something that's capable of placing in the neighborhood of 10k and up. We're a high mix low volume shop so easy setups is key. I'd be looking at a MY-9
Electronics Forum | Mon Jan 14 12:28:06 EST 2008 | swag
We are in North Western U.S. I like 2.6 better (for our mix of builds, anyway). 1.0 works great on PTF parts such as fine pitch QFP's but I don't like it for chips. It's too picky and we wind up forcing parts to the 4.0. We have another GSM dual
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 07 08:44:29 EST 2023 | spoiltforchoice
> Does the 'R' suffix not mean a rotary head on the > machine? This will then allow for that head to be > a 'chip shooter' but does so with a lower height > off the PCB being assembled. That is, the rotary > head offers some gain i
Electronics Forum | Mon Sep 12 10:53:22 EDT 2005 | cmiller
The Advantis was more accurate than the turret, so he claimed. The Single beam (dual lead screw drive-this is not a GSM 1) flex machine is $125K the Lightning is $150K. They changed the pricing in 2004. I was quoted a Topaz XII at $187K. I know Phili
Electronics Forum | Mon Jan 29 11:53:54 EST 2007 | mika
Is this a single beam (GSM1)or a dual beam machine (GSM2)? If it is a GSM1; how does the pickup works with Head 2 from the front feeder banks? Do you have removeable or fixed feeder banks? If removeable, make it fixed, using screws through the bank
.gif)
.png)