Full Site - : eclipse ii (Page 6 of 7)

Assembleon Eclipse II Calibration problem Z

Electronics Forum | Thu Sep 15 16:40:55 EDT 2016 | zippi

Hello, i have a problem with the Calibaration of my Assembleon Eclipse II. There is a problem with the down Z Position of Head 2. They are 2mm deeper as Head1 by picking up any Componend. Laser High are OK. How Can i setup the Head down High.

Difference between Philips Eclipse and Eclipse II

Electronics Forum | Fri Nov 30 00:51:10 EST 2007 | vinitverma

Here are the differences (Eclipse vs Eclipse II) Optimum Speed: 5000 vs 6500cph Feeder Positions (8mm) : 80 vs 94 PCB Loading Time : 4s vs 5.3s PCB Thickness : 0.6-3mm vs 0.5-4mm Max Component Size : 32mm vs 45mm (optional camera possible on Eclipse

POWERLEDS

Electronics Forum | Wed May 02 08:59:30 EDT 2007 | Mario

Hello, What could be the cause of the skewed mounted LXHL PW01 kinds of POWERLEDS? Is the bad recognition (although detected sucessfully)or the machine is uncalibrated? The machine used is Eclipse II from Assembleon. What workarounds can be made to

philips Eclipse-II

Electronics Forum | Wed May 05 16:12:30 EDT 2010 | thanh

after calibration, now i'm having an issue that placement between lazer and camera off about .5mm on the Y mount. if parts go to camera, the placement are good. but parts that placing with lazer it off about .5mm at Y for all rotation. anyone seen t

philips Eclipse-II

Electronics Forum | Sun May 16 00:07:58 EDT 2010 | tpappano

I have a Philips CSM84VZ. There are offset calibrations that compensate the X and Y distances from the camera to the heads and the beam pointer. Perhaps yours is similar and just needs a small Y adjustment for the beam pointer.

philips Eclipse-II

Electronics Forum | Tue Jun 01 15:06:40 EDT 2010 | thanh

I did. Nothing change. I can go in mount feed back and increase .5mm for all rotations(Lazer mount feed back), then it work. But all my parts go to camera will be off the oposite way.

Difference between Philips Eclipse and Eclipse II

Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 22 09:21:05 EST 2007 | hsodan

Hello, If somebody can point out few most important differences between those two models I would be grateful. We are shopping for used machine, but the spec's we get for both models are the same, the price not, even if comparing machines with similar

Assembleon / Philips support. Ask your question.

Electronics Forum | Mon Jun 07 15:54:56 EDT 2010 | thanh

ECLIPSE-II After calibration, now i'm having an issue that placement between lazer and camera off about .5mm on the Y mount. if parts go to camera, the placement are good. but parts that placing with lazer it off about .5mm at Y for all rotation. do

philips Eclipse-II

Electronics Forum | Sat May 29 02:20:08 EDT 2010 | vinitverma

Mch Adjust > Adjust Target > Laser Unit > Nozzle Position. Here the laser will automatically detect the centre of the nozzle. Remember - It'll give you the option of using a component for the test but DON'T use any component. Let it detect the centre

Topaz Off-line software.

Electronics Forum | Fri Jan 16 19:02:55 EST 2004 | Frank Gearhart - Assembl�on Snr. Software Technical Specialist

The OS/2 software you are referring to is the CSM-PPS v3 which was released in 1999, it is now out of service. The current software for optimizing, balancing, and generating programs for a Topaz and other Gem machines off-line, is GemLine-PPS v8.0,


eclipse ii searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information