Full Site - : f4g (Page 10 of 13)

QP-132E // FCM 2

Electronics Forum | Sat Apr 20 07:44:01 EDT 2002 | Bob

I heard from a second hand source that the heads required calibrating reqularly and to do that they needed to be sent to the manufacturers. I also heard that they were fairly unstable and broke down alot. All these were not from first hand experian

Max and Min nozzle settings on CP7

Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 20 04:16:02 EDT 2004 | Charles Huang

Wondering if there any CP7/F4G programmers out there that can help me out with this one. I'm assuming the setting for max and min nozzle in the "environment" section of the part data would allow me to use either the specified max OR min nozzle in th

ProSmt+ Fuji controller

Electronics Forum | Mon Mar 16 07:40:06 EDT 2009 | jdengler

Hi Pete, For the price the ProSmt+ is good. I do not have much experience with F4G but do with MCS. It very easy to use with a few exceptions. The PD editor on ProSMT+ is buggy. If you copy a PD edit it and save it under a new name it's lnked so

Can F4G connect with more than 8 CP7 or QP3?

Electronics Forum | Tue Jun 11 15:56:43 EDT 2002 | mjabure

Actually F4G is a programming environment similar to panatools, not a machine, it stands for "Fuji 4th Generation". The connection being questioned is to the communication network, and yes with the proper hardware you should be able to connect more t

Re: obective comparison between siplace and fuji pick and place equipment

Electronics Forum | Sat Oct 10 18:35:18 EDT 1998 | phillip hunter

| we currently have a siplace line(80s/f) and are inhereting a fuji line from another site. I need an objective comparison between the two. What are the strengths and weaknesses of the fuji with regard to programming, operating and maintenance. any c

Re: Fujicam Users

Electronics Forum | Tue Sep 15 11:32:04 EDT 1998 | Jim Price

| FujiCam users | I am looking for any feedback concerning Fujicam. | User friendly? | Any Bugs? | Any input would be nice | Mike Mike, While I don't have any experience with Fujicam, I do have a lot of experience with PanaPRO from Panasert. These

Re: CIMBridge versus Unicam

Electronics Forum | Thu Aug 06 11:02:18 EDT 1998 | Jim Price

| | Dew: | | Is this the third or forth software alignment for Fuji? Hope they stick with Unicam for a period of time... | | Just my two cents.... | I believe it's the forth, MCS OS/9, MCXE,F4G, and now fujicam...were there any others I missed? | Pe

Re: CIMBridge versus Unicam

Electronics Forum | Mon Aug 31 10:28:11 EDT 1998 | Patrick O'Connor

| | | | Dew: | | | Is this the third or forth software alignment for Fuji? Hope they stick with Unicam for a period of time... | | | Just my two cents.... | | I believe it's the forth, MCS OS/9, MCXE,F4G, and now fujicam...were there any others I m

QP2 vs GSM

Electronics Forum | Fri May 22 07:59:14 EDT 1998 | Jerry

We are currently comparing the Fuji QP2 machine to the Universal GSM. The primary use will be for QFP's down to .4 mm pitch and for 300+I/O BGAs. My initial input has been that you spend alot of time tweeking PD's on the QP because the vision syste

Re: QP2 vs GSM

Electronics Forum | Thu May 28 18:16:40 EDT 1998 | Ian Bates

| We are currently comparing the Fuji QP2 machine to the Universal GSM. The primary use will be for QFP's down to .4 mm pitch and for 300+I/O BGAs. My initial input has been that you spend alot of time tweeking PD's on the QP because the vision sys


f4g searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information