Electronics Forum | Tue Apr 30 13:42:36 EDT 2002 | Jeff Price
If your intested in a QP-132 contact your local Fuji rep. You may also want to look at 2 CP-733's they will provide a much smaller footprint then a QP-132 and get clsoe to the throughput. If you need help conecting up with your local rep email me and
Electronics Forum | Wed May 01 22:20:02 EDT 2002 | saiwong
We can't affort the new QP132. It costs more than a million bucks each plus power feeders. We can only buy from the used markets. CP7's X-Y Table is moving too fast. They need special solder paste. Very expensive solder paste to hold the components.
Electronics Forum | Sat May 04 21:02:26 EDT 2002 | saiwong
I really don't think so. Most of the time copy is much better than the original. For the durabilities, Philips can't compare with the Fuji, Resale vaule, productivities. Fuji is the best. Philips has many original; CD, SACD, Plasma Display. But the J
Electronics Forum | Fri Dec 17 11:06:44 EST 2004 | Base
Sorry Rob, FCM-1: first machines around 1990 FCM-2: first machines around 1996 FCM Multiflex: I think it was 2001? AX: about 1.5 years now But indeed, let's finish it: the entire discussion drifted a bit away from the initial question. I just get a
Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 15 16:02:39 EDT 2002 | tmv
Agreed that the FCM has been the choice in the past...but have you seen the 4797S HSP (TCM X100)? Usually (2) 4797S's can replace (1) FCM for about the same purchase price, and only a slighly larger footprint (consider the cost of ownership as well..
Electronics Forum | Sat Apr 20 07:44:01 EDT 2002 | Bob
I heard from a second hand source that the heads required calibrating reqularly and to do that they needed to be sent to the manufacturers. I also heard that they were fairly unstable and broke down alot. All these were not from first hand experian
Electronics Forum | Sat Apr 20 22:50:36 EDT 2002 | lysik
I am sure the QP-132 is a more stable platform. It is a Fuki after all. My big question is why not X2 CP-6 machines. I mean you can tell by resale value of the FCM Vs the QP-132 that the QP-132 is a rock solid machine but, for such cheap money two CP
Electronics Forum | Fri May 03 01:25:33 EDT 2002 | gerits
Dear Sir, I do not want to mix in this "subjective" discussion but as an employee of Assembl�on (buider of FCM II, FCM multiflex 50, 75, 100) I can provide you with MTTR, MTBF, placement data (0201), software, and other (also customer) data on our e
Electronics Forum | Fri May 31 16:16:42 EDT 2002 | Ozzy
Does Fuji even make the QP-132 anymore? I have not seen it at Apex for the past 2-3 years. This "inflexible" dinosaur was a commercial disaster for Fuji. Philips/Assembleon has sold countless more FCM than Fuji QP-132. The problem with both machines
Electronics Forum | Wed Dec 15 11:24:10 EST 2004 | fastek
You're correct Rob. If you go back any amount of time in this business like it sounds you have (and I know I have), it wasn't that long ago that companies like Philips and Seimens were way behind everyone else, (Fuji and Pana) when it came to buildin
