Electronics Forum | Mon May 01 15:55:35 EDT 2006 | pfifla1
Well Fuji sends software updates directly to PC and at the end of every year it is required to install the new updates to keep running so pretty much if you have the PC you have the software for life. unlike software like circuitCam and others that u
Electronics Forum | Tue Nov 23 07:42:47 EST 2004 | Alan
I was highly debating the purchase of Tecnomatix (Assembly Expert) software. However, went with Circuitcam for a few reasons. Call me at 248-994-3012 if you want details.
Electronics Forum | Wed May 27 18:19:58 EDT 2009 | dcell_1t
yesterday I tried with vision type 20, just defined the two pair of leads and error 1CA14003 came up, on flexa error help says the following: Cause: The Vision_type in part data is expressed using hexadecimal notation (??). If ?? equals 0A, 0B, 0C,
Electronics Forum | Thu Sep 09 03:57:45 EDT 2004 | svi
Hello, We used FujiCAM to prepare FCM programs but now we're thinking to change it to an other software. We have some FCM and some (more) FUJI machines also. We used FujiCAM to controll and proram the lines but we changed it to Fuji FlexA. Microsof
Electronics Forum | Wed Jun 29 19:33:12 EDT 2005 | matjen
After the machine stops for any reason when restarted the z table goes to loader position comes up then goes back down and re-reads the fiducials, only one machine does this but we are losing valuable cycle time after every part change. We have Fuji
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 17 16:21:20 EDT 2009 | gregf912
I have not played with ProSMT software but I have used both MCS and F4G. MCS was good for its time, 15-20 years ago, but F4G is much better and easier to use. The windows interface works well and F4G and has optimizers for Cp, IP, QP machines. F4G wa
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 20 19:18:53 EDT 2007 | diesel_1t
Hi to all, thank you very much for your feedback. The part is rotated before inspection; and also tend to be shifted to the same direction of pre-rotation so i think is not correcting misalignment or maybe some settings on shape data are not correc
Electronics Forum | Fri Nov 01 17:32:34 EDT 2013 | dhruv_trylene
I am sorry for not being clear enough... We have a FUJI CP642 and a IP3 machine. At present, we have to create part data for each and every part used in a job, which consumes a lot of time. I was just wondering if there was a way to minimize this?
Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 04 10:17:18 EDT 2012 | daxman
Good morning, Just a few questions to clarify: 1. You backed up your machine proper data. 2. You upgraded Fuji Flexa. 3. You re-transmitted the proper data 4. Now, components are not placing properly? Do you have a fuji 96-001 calibration board? Ha
Electronics Forum | Mon Nov 04 12:21:03 EST 2013 | jimmyboz
Its been a couple years since I worked with Flexa every day. The program uses the part number and this should reference some shape library. If you understand the nomenclature of this library, it should get you close. I don't remember if the default
