Full Site - : fuji flexa software data (Page 19 of 33)

Re: Glue dot question:

Electronics Forum | Thu Jun 29 08:47:34 EDT 2000 | JAX

Mark, The machine you decide to go with will probably depend on what you have already. If you use an offline optimizer, you will want a machine that will work with the software(Fuji, Universal, whatever you use!). If you plan on programming online,

Re: Programming with F4G

Electronics Forum | Wed Sep 08 23:36:12 EDT 1999 | Jason Tomlinson

| | | Dear all, | | | | | | I don't know if I'm asking at the right place here, since you all seem to be more focused on process problems then programming problems (or perhaps programming isn't a problem for you). | | | | | | I'm using FUJI CP642's

Re: QP2 vs GSM

Electronics Forum | Thu May 28 22:02:09 EDT 1998 | Ian Bates

Jerry, I have been using the QP in a Proto and Production environment for about a Year and once the PD is Created(which may take some time) and vision processes. I rarely ever need to make further changes. As far as BGA Pd's. They are a Little

Rating SMT Machines

Electronics Forum | Mon Oct 21 18:15:13 EDT 2002 | cnoonan

Fuji: Wonderful machine, very robust, Hardware second to none. Lacking on software Universal: Love the GSM, great platform. Sanyo HSP�s are ok, like the new 4796, not sure about the 4797 yet, have not had it long enough to give good data. Sieme

Mydata Pick and place

Electronics Forum | Wed May 09 12:07:52 EDT 2001 | caldon

My personal favorite is the Siemens F series and the UIC GSM platform. Both Siemens and UIC have awesome resources for csp, flipchip and baredie processing - Siemens= Dan Baldwin from GaTech; UIC = George Westby from UIC labs. My second choice would

fiducial

Electronics Forum | Thu May 13 10:43:34 EDT 2004 | rob_thomas

hi, i have a question relating to fiducial, is > the fiducial normally comes with the pick and > place data from the custommer or we have to > define it by ourself? how to set its coordinate > so that the cp6 and ip3 (using Fujicam software) > w

Re: Fuji MCS/2 vs. F4G

Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 16 16:25:18 EST 1999 | Tuffty

| We use both F4G and MCS at the present and we are phasing out MCS. One main reason is that it's platform is not Y2K compliant. F4G is cumbersome and taxes a high overhead on your computer system. We have also found a bug recently when we have hi

Re: Problem with a IP2 Machine Interface of FujiCam

Electronics Forum | Fri Nov 10 10:39:43 EST 2000 | omar_verdugo

Hello Eva. I was using Fujicam 1.1 and i had a problem with the theta is in the shape library for example all the drawings are on 0 degress like a in the part data and all that work fine with the anothers machines like a cp6, but when i use a ip2 i m

Re: Programming with F4G

Electronics Forum | Mon Sep 06 13:52:12 EDT 1999 | KEVIN SIMPSON

| Dear all, | | I don't know if I'm asking at the right place here, since you all seem to be more focused on process problems then programming problems (or perhaps programming isn't a problem for you). | | I'm using FUJI CP642's and I've got some c


fuji flexa software data searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information