Electronics Forum | Tue Sep 23 15:27:17 EDT 2008 | slthomas
You'd still have to change all of the part library references, make up new ones for new parts, enter feeder sizes, etc. More trouble than it's worth, once you know how to use the software and prep your cad data to be compatible with it. There are lo
Electronics Forum | Tue Oct 26 00:03:09 EDT 2010 | jmelson
Hmm, that's a fairly old machine, even older than mine! (I have a CSM84 PA130640). Anyway, it is best to program the machine from CAD system data, I wrote a little program in C to read in the component type and XYR position, and produce the file in
Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 02 11:57:08 EDT 2007 | realchunks
Well, I thing mowing his lawn will get your farther, but if you insist.... Fids - Fiducial registration seems to be a bear with most machines. Especially now that most boards are shipped form over seas, the quality is all over the map. Plus the fa
Electronics Forum | Sat Aug 17 03:39:13 EDT 2002 | shrikant_borkar
Monitor daily Machine MIS data for parts rejection ofcourse your weekly/monthly preventive maintenance must be regular. following steps- will be helful 1. qulaity output from machine by taking immidiate action over online detected faults. concentrat
Electronics Forum | Sat Nov 20 12:18:47 EST 2004 | jk@37h3r.net
Thanks for all the responses! I definitely agree, I don't like the idea of using floppies, either - and our HD is WELL, and regularly, backed up. While I both program and operate the machine, mgmt is insistent on this method. I ended up just copyi
Electronics Forum | Thu Jan 27 06:12:14 EST 2000 | Dean
Opeator point of view: 1. eassy to read menues. Organized structure. Large text and use of color to indicate important info status...green=good, yellow= warning, red=fatal etc. Simplicity rules in this realm. GUI are great for operations screens
