Electronics Forum | Wed May 09 03:13:06 EDT 2012 | umar
I had send my coating board to the test lab for adhesion coating test. 3 times send, the result 3times fail. The coating chemical use is Humiseal 1B31. The process is clean the boards at washing process use the Vigon A200 saponifier mix with DI wate
Electronics Forum | Mon Nov 06 10:51:23 EST 2006 | SteveH
We have 2 PVA2400 4 axis selective spray machines that we use to spray Humiseal 1B31 and 1A33. They take a bit of programming to get right, though this is easy to do, but do the job OK. Another to consider if you need the 4 axis of movement would b
Electronics Forum | Thu Jan 22 03:25:26 EST 2009 | stevewilde
What masking tape can people recommend for masking the board when conformal coating. I am using a PVA autocoat machine and humiseal 1B31. Current tape, is leaving residue on board when used to hold link wires down whilst glue cures and also when used
Electronics Forum | Thu May 31 15:00:33 EDT 2012 | jdumont
I use Trace Labs and certainly recommend them. I actually just had this test done last week. Adhesion test per ASTM-3359 Method B. We also use Humiseal 1B73, which is similar to the 1B31 you use. Is your soldermask "active" enough for this coat
Electronics Forum | Wed Oct 17 02:04:39 EDT 2018 | robl
SCC3 has an operating temperature of 200C, as long as it is heat cured at 100C. https://www.electrolube.com/pdf/tds/044/DCA.pdf It's also a silicone so needs to be coated & cured away from anything you value. Otherwise there are plenty of PU's and
Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 25 07:37:42 EST 2010 | pcbrown
We are using Humiseal 1B31 and polyester dots for masking. We are spraying this in a Binks sprayer mixed at almost 1:1 with 521 thinner. Whe are seeing the coating creating thin halos around the poly dots as if the dots are "rejecting" the coating. T
Electronics Forum | Wed Mar 24 15:04:05 EST 1999 | Greg Curler
I am looking into replacing another business division's Acrylic coating process with our Urethane coating process. Unfortunately, MIL-I-46068 doesn't differentiate AR/UR's performance, and the MFR data sheets don't match up at all (they each spec di
Electronics Forum | Wed Mar 24 21:40:05 EST 1999 | Dave F
| I am looking into replacing another business division's Acrylic coating process with our Urethane coating process. Unfortunately, MIL-I-46068 doesn't differentiate AR/UR's performance, and the MFR data sheets don't match up at all (they each spec
Electronics Forum | Fri May 18 06:49:58 EDT 2012 | kahrpr
We us a lot of 1B31 it could be one of the most common coatings out there. We do not clean the boards and do not have an issue. I would check the solder mask compatibly. I would also see how the 3rd party company is testing the boards what criteria o
Electronics Forum | Wed Mar 04 10:05:13 EST 2020 | dontfeedphils
In a past life I used a Swam Blaster from Crystal Mark with the media from them as well. I used it on Humiseal 1A31 and 1B31 (I think those were the products, it's been a little while). This machine and material were awesome IMO. Made CC removal a
