Full Site - : ipc 7711/21 rev c (Page 5 of 6)

Re: S.P.O.T.T.

Electronics Forum | Wed Jun 12 11:26:50 EDT 2002 | pjc

Sean, Have you contacted Speedline Technologies applications enegineers? They have a lot of knowledge about SPOTT working with customers over the years to develop the process. I myself have experience doing SPOTT. I used Fuji GSP2 printers with overs

Accidental solder mask

Electronics Forum | Tue Dec 17 12:53:28 EST 2002 | russ

You looked one page to far in the IPC book! Fillet height of 75% is acceptable for all 3 classes. Per IPC 610 rev. C Section 6 table 6.2. A. Circumferential wetting on Primary side (top)between lead and barrel (not anualar ring) Class 1 Not spe

Re: haloing on SMT PCBs

Electronics Forum | Mon Jun 08 15:00:08 EDT 1998 | Earl Moon

| I work QA at an OEM in Alberta, Canada. I saw earlier posts on the smtnet regarding PCB haloing criteria. I am currently in a dispute with my PCB vendor over the acceptability of haloing (delamination) around plated through holes and vias on a lot

Touch up on 0603 Chips ( Ceramic caps)

Electronics Forum | Mon Jan 31 14:08:26 EST 2000 | Ashok Dhawan

I have got a number of assemblies back from a customer with feedback that the solder fillet is less than 25% of chip height per IPC-Standard-610B Class 2. Most of my joints are having good wetting but fillet height does not meet min ht requirement of

Re: haloing on SMT PCBs

Electronics Forum | Mon Jun 08 15:01:02 EDT 1998 | D.Lange

| I work QA at an OEM in Alberta, Canada. I saw earlier posts on the smtnet regarding PCB haloing criteria. I am currently in a dispute with my PCB vendor over the acceptability of haloing (delamination) around plated through holes and vias on a lot


ipc 7711/21 rev c searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information