Electronics Forum | Fri Sep 23 16:39:00 EDT 2011 | action_101
The small investemnt of purchasing the IPC-610 manual will pay for itself very quickly. A brief description of the two classes in a few words would be the following: Class II - a well built product with reasonable expectations for both the manufactur
Electronics Forum | Wed Feb 29 06:33:49 EST 2012 | amitsindwani
Please define the defect in following conditions & link to IPC 610 clause/sub-clause no.: 1. 0603 component placed on 0805 PCB pad 2. 0805 component placed on 0603 PCB pad 3. 1206 component placed on 1210 PCB pad and 4. 1210 component placed on 1206
Electronics Forum | Fri Dec 21 08:38:54 EST 2018 | msbettyhunt
Yes, I have very good but short experience over there because due to some personal experience I didn't completed my certification in IPC 610 CIS Course but will definitely continue when'll I get the chance. Hopefully, will continue again in next mont
Electronics Forum | Fri Oct 27 10:54:19 EDT 2017 | sumote
Might i suggest reading the IPC-610-F (or any recent revision). Even if you are not going to build to it, you should get some idea of what your product should look like and some basic requirements. A good experienced SMT Engineer sounds like a good
Electronics Forum | Sun Feb 28 13:51:56 EST 2021 | bengill
We have a unique connector with flat leads, i.e. the leads leave the connector body flat parallel to the pads. The leads are without a heel, they are flush with the connector body. Moreover, one can't solder beneath the connector because the leads ar
Electronics Forum | Tue Nov 28 15:10:50 EST 2006 | M. Sanders
Unfortunately, I don't have a copy of IPC-A-610 D on hand, however, I believe in IPC-610, this �floating height� between lead and pad has no maximum specification restriction. As long as there is no voiding, it is still acceptable for all 3 classes.
Electronics Forum | Mon May 07 08:46:18 EDT 2001 | CAL
Searching the IPC website is a good start. http://www.ipc.org Some standards you may want to look over are.... IPC 600, IPC 610, J-STD-001 "riveting and circuit cards into metal shelf" definitely has my curiosity level elevated. Since you know your
Electronics Forum | Thu Aug 07 22:51:05 EDT 2008 | davef
We expect aerospace to be IPC-A-610, Class 3 and J-STD-001, Class 3. The above quality statement stecifies: * "IPC 610, Class 2 acceptability." This is unclear. Should this be "IPC-A-610, Class 2 acceptability?" * No class for J-STD-001. Should we a
Electronics Forum | Tue Sep 26 10:04:52 EDT 2000 | Chris May
Darren, You may/will get people referring you to the archives, which is a fair shout. But, by "failure rate" you probably mean "acceptance". What is good and bad depends upon your own acceptance criteria (IPC-610 ?). Find out what the acceptance c
Electronics Forum | Tue Apr 04 10:08:33 EDT 2000 | Russ
Neil, IPC 610 has the criteria for solder balls re. quantity and size per sq./in. These are acheivable requirements but no-clean is not necessarily a drop in process. You need to review stencil /pad /component design to ensure that "midship" solde
.png)