Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 27 16:55:31 EST 2003 | johnwnz
Hi Folks, trying to track down if there is a std for the max number of track repairs that you can don on a PCB. IPC 610 gives me an indication of what is acceptable in term's of the amount of damage I can have on a track before it's a fail however n
Electronics Forum | Thu Sep 23 14:58:50 EDT 2004 | C Lampron
EMS-Engineer, Lead free alloys have a very low wetting creep. You probably will not ever get the same type of weting with a LF as opposed to SN 63/37. The question is if it is acceptable. Lead free solder joints cannot be inspected to the same crite
Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 03 16:33:24 EST 2005 | pjc
Revision D has over 730 new and updated illustrations of acceptability criteria and has been critically reviewed for clarity and accuracy. The document synchronizes to the requirements expressed in other industry consensus documents and is used with
Electronics Forum | Sat Feb 18 15:40:45 EST 2006 | Cmiller
Switch to SN100C (no pun intended). I cant help with the SAC 305 issues but we should have a wave with SN100 running very soon. I will let you all know how that goes. Please report back on the x-sectioning and share the results. I have heard some v
Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 18 15:47:07 EDT 2006 | Mark
IPC610 training to help verify issues that might arise. Also, the opeators need to know part numbers and descriptions because that should be common knowledge when running a SMT line. Plus, with your comment "At our company they know how the pick&plac
Electronics Forum | Thu Apr 05 09:18:14 EDT 2007 | pjc
Please note that pin holes and blow holes are not always defects. The latest IPC 610A Rev D workmanship standard has them as process indicators- depending on Class. I don't have the document handly while writing this. It would be good to look that up
Electronics Forum | Thu Apr 05 13:40:15 EDT 2007 | slthomas
"I just need better reasons than it [...] increases defect probability." If that's not enough, you have bigger problems. Have you seen any rework/repair that was generated by this handling gem? Does your company profess to build to IPC specificati
Electronics Forum | Wed May 09 13:37:07 EDT 2007 | jmills
Greetings Tried to search past threads without an answer. I have a resistor that just fits the between pads. Some of the resisitor were installed without the termnation sitting on the pad and are infact sitting on solder a good .020 to .025 above th
Electronics Forum | Thu Sep 27 10:53:59 EDT 2007 | gregoryyork
Joris, > > Yep, very common to have those small > blow holes in lead-free alloys. We used to get > them very consistently on white-tin finished > boards, and less frequently with gold finished > boards, for what ever that is worth. > > IPC-6
Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 01 17:15:03 EDT 2008 | ronhodgson
I would like an interpretation of a solder fillet on a 5 side termination cap. (Ref: IPC-610, sec. 8.2.2.6). My question pertains to the definition of dimension F, and what constitutes the top of the fillet. Does the top of the fillet end at where
.gif)
