Electronics Forum | Tue Nov 28 15:10:50 EST 2006 | M. Sanders
Unfortunately, I don't have a copy of IPC-A-610 D on hand, however, I believe in IPC-610, this �floating height� between lead and pad has no maximum specification restriction. As long as there is no voiding, it is still acceptable for all 3 classes.
Electronics Forum | Thu Apr 05 09:18:14 EDT 2007 | pjc
Please note that pin holes and blow holes are not always defects. The latest IPC 610A Rev D workmanship standard has them as process indicators- depending on Class. I don't have the document handly while writing this. It would be good to look that up
Electronics Forum | Thu Sep 27 10:53:59 EDT 2007 | gregoryyork
Joris, > > Yep, very common to have those small > blow holes in lead-free alloys. We used to get > them very consistently on white-tin finished > boards, and less frequently with gold finished > boards, for what ever that is worth. > > IPC-6
Electronics Forum | Wed Mar 03 06:13:23 EST 2010 | grahamcooper22
The picture shows that the heel of the device lead is not on the pad. Either bad placement or wrong pad dimensions. I imagine most customers would reject this joint as only a small part of the lead is actually in the solder. With no heel fillet the j
Electronics Forum | Thu Jun 27 17:32:35 EDT 2013 | tpost
We recently had a question come up regarding the amount of solder on a flat underside termination ( we referenced Flat Lug Lead in IPC 610). Judging by the photo you can see on the Left is a target solder joint, but on the right is one which had rewo
Electronics Forum | Tue Oct 15 11:16:30 EDT 2019 | charliedci
We have been using Cree 3 color LED's (CLV6A-FKB) in many products for several years (pic attached). At the rate of 3 to 5% of the units assembled with this LED, the Red LED fails. After touch up with soldering iron it functions. This happens to the
Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 11 12:59:06 EST 2020 | astarotf
Hi Steve Thomas Effectively by IPC-610 standard specifies in the "content 8.2.13 Quad Flat Pack Plastic Package - Without Terminals (PQFN), Table 8-13, page 8-84" which depending on the class of manufacture notes 2-5 of the table, which in theory do
Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 26 16:29:48 EST 2021 | charliedci
We will be exploring the exciting world of step stencils for the first time and I am looking for any advice from anyone using regularly. This direction is because we have large caps and soldered standoffs along with medium pitch LGA's and QFP's on sa
Electronics Forum | Tue Dec 17 12:53:28 EST 2002 | russ
You looked one page to far in the IPC book! Fillet height of 75% is acceptable for all 3 classes. Per IPC 610 rev. C Section 6 table 6.2. A. Circumferential wetting on Primary side (top)between lead and barrel (not anualar ring) Class 1 Not spe
Electronics Forum | Mon Nov 01 09:54:29 EST 1999 | dave r
Jason, Have the class III requirements changed? Dave
