Electronics Forum | Mon Dec 02 09:47:54 EST 2002 | davef
Most modern spec do not distinguish between process methods. So, there is no allowance "if you are using bla bla bla method, you should see ... . But if you are using bla bla de bla method, ignore that and look for ... ." Most specifications requi
Electronics Forum | Thu May 17 07:36:40 EDT 2001 | Bob Willis
Here is a copy of a draft document on PIHR Inspection I have jotted down on a flight to Scotland yesterday, any comments suggestions etc ? I have already most of the photos for the standard but as you know there is nothing in the IPC document it just
Electronics Forum | Thu Dec 03 21:40:01 EST 2020 | itmconsulting
Hey Kyle - Good for you for pushing your horizons and considering pin-in-paste (aka "Intrusive Soldering"). Don't let the nay-sayers out there discourage you. When I encounter mixed tech PCBAs (SMT and through-hole) my first choice, if the design a
Electronics Forum | Tue Dec 04 08:34:07 EST 2007 | davef
We no advice to give you on the topic, but maybe while you're waiting for others to reply, reading a trade journal article on the topic might help. Below is a link to "Pin-in-hole reflow (PIHR) and lead-free solder joints" by David Bernard, Bob Willi
Electronics Forum | Mon Jan 28 08:07:44 EST 2002 | JohnW
Sorry I keep forgetting you lot are backwards in the old metric system :0) anyhoo, yes IPC, the bastions of right well as long as your board is only 1.6mm thick (sorry 62mils)say that you need 75% min general and 50% on ground planes. I'd like to se
