Electronics Forum | Fri May 24 03:24:14 EDT 2019 | weglimir
Thank you! it is the same on other slots as well, when I removed the board, error was the same, but it appeared instantly after DEK Program was loaded. When it is inserted - this error appears after 10 seconds (approximately) so it seems like somethi
Electronics Forum | Thu Oct 05 13:00:33 EDT 2006 | john_smith
CN, I forgot a couple things. The DEK printers are easy to program at about 3-5 min. The MPM is a little more difficult to program and it takes about 20-30 min. Resale value is also in DEKs favor. Just look around in the equipment section and see all
Electronics Forum | Thu Aug 16 11:15:38 EDT 2012 | menatech
delete the pointer readings.dek. If the printer loads after restart is the problem a corrupt program (last printed product. if this not work could it be a problem with the DEK config file. save the the file on floppy and delete it from the m/c. the s
Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 19 15:28:34 EDT 2020 | emeto
You are programing something wrong or your image is not in the center of the stencil. On DEK machines you can move a lot in Y by offseting the image in the program. In X machine can move +_5mm. Now, sometimes there is a way around this as well if yo
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 31 09:25:18 EDT 2020 | emeto
If you believe your picture is in the middle and is not skewed, than go to your basics and recheck your fiducial locations and detection. Sometimes these machines recognize something around and give you this error. Try program with isolated pads and
Electronics Forum | Mon Oct 09 20:14:29 EDT 2006 | marcelll
I'm repairing SMT for 20 years and I've worked with both machines. From my experience, I always had a bunch of problems with DEK printer and the service is terrible if your not a big one. MPM is more reliable, parts cheaper & service much better. Pro
Electronics Forum | Thu Oct 05 16:45:19 EDT 2006 | realchunks
Wow, I'd have to say the exact opposite. Compared to MPM the DEKs were WAY longer to program. But find out for yourself CN. Program each and get back to us. Don't forget to program in 2D as well. That will be the kicker! As for spending money,
Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 15 14:51:39 EST 2007 | nitro
We have five 1997 DEK 265LTs, and we have never had to have the stencil house blacken any fiducials. The fiducials are etched about halfway through the stencil. You can adjust the lighting in each individual program, not just a global lighting change
Electronics Forum | Mon Oct 09 14:30:44 EDT 2006 | Brian
I agree with Chunks. Programming was much simpler. The 2D inspection is much better on MPM. I didn't have to use offsets on the MPM or the DEK very often, but did more on teh DEK. I didn't like the front justified stencils on the DEK. I also did
Electronics Forum | Wed Nov 20 12:56:58 EST 2002 | jasper
In my opinion MPM is superior as far as programming the 2D inspection. It's fast, simple and reliable. The DEK has options like Formflex. The MPM only offers adjustable vacuum box. It's difficult. 2nd hand prices are not similar. We offer used/refurb
