Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 25 08:35:49 EST 2003 | pjc
AccuFlex is the replacement for UltraPrint 1500. UP1500 is going obsolete. AccuFlex was desgigned for fast setup and changeovers and takes some tasks away from the operator. The UltraPrint 2000 was designed for high production, even though many users
Electronics Forum | Wed Apr 07 11:42:16 EDT 1999 | Tony A
| Tony | | Although I agree in principle with Dean that 45 Degrees would be ideal, most of the squeegees I have worked with have been 60 Degrees to the stencil surface. This seems to work best with metal squeegees when printing HASL boards, because
Electronics Forum | Fri Sep 22 12:21:06 EDT 2006 | daxman
We are using the Universal tooling..the one with the side plates. I'm not sure what the C-tool is. The machine did not come with much. I'm running the vision system test now..I've never done it before..but I'll let you know what happens with it. To
Electronics Forum | Tue Aug 30 11:13:23 EDT 2011 | markaustin
Hello Bill A colleague here at ACW just told me about your question and as we have a few of these machines I feel that I'm in a position to answer you. Prior to 2007 we only used DEK265 (GS & GSX) machines and these we getting a bit old and passed
Electronics Forum | Fri May 23 04:25:14 EDT 2008 | muarty
One thing that has to be considered when using rheometric pumps is that the board support should match as that of the pump head being used. You can print 6" boards, but you should really still use board supports upto 16". As mentioned previously if t
Electronics Forum | Fri Jun 05 19:33:55 EDT 1998 | Steve Gregory
Hidee Ho Brian! Just like the other Steve, we just bought a SPM too. Our is brand new, and it's a SPM-AV (has vision). The other option we have is a automatic underside stencil cleaner. We're a contract assembler as well, just starting up.
Electronics Forum | Tue Oct 27 15:25:02 EST 1998 | Stefan W.
Hi Samson ! In order to give you more detailed information I would like to know what your component range is and how many boards you supposed to do. Panasonic and MPM are a good choice, however, Panasonic has not many P&P machines on the U.S. market,
Electronics Forum | Sun Mar 07 21:26:54 EST 1999 | Chris G.
| My printer evaluation has come down to the Fuji GP-6 or the Dek 265LT. I'm looking for experienced opinions on both of these options, we're currently running an older vintage Dek 265 printer that gives us constant electronic system problems. The v
Electronics Forum | Sat Jun 13 00:33:41 EDT 1998 | Scott McKee
| Hidee Ho Brian! | Just like the other Steve, we just bought a SPM too. Our is brand new, and it's a SPM-AV (has vision). The other option we have is a automatic underside stencil cleaner. | We're a contract assembler as well, just starti
Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 03 10:20:12 EST 2000 | se
Steve, I'd stop worrying about the in-line feature of the printer, I've never really seen an in-line system that wasn't capable of batch operation and there will be very little, if any, cost saving associated with going batch load only. An in-line m
