Electronics Forum | Mon Sep 19 09:46:32 EDT 2011 | blnorman
Hopefully the coating does contain a UV tracer. We used a silicone years ago that did not, but UV did make it fluoresce to a degree, you just couldn't ensure 100% coverage. One time we did have a problem with the coating getting on connector pins,
Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 06 15:56:22 EDT 2011 | duso02
We do parylene coating and really frown upon using a UV additive. Technically, it's a contaminant to the parylene.
Electronics Forum | Thu Jun 16 18:11:30 EDT 2011 | kvanzill
Has anyone done any testing with UV tracer in Parylene processing? Does it cause adhesion problems? Does anyone have any data they can share on this.
Electronics Forum | Thu Jul 07 11:35:16 EDT 2011 | blnorman
I had read somewhere that parylene absorbs UV radiation, and therefore offers very low UV protection. So, yeah probably not a good idea. Plus since it's vapor deposited, unless there is no access to a surface, all surfaces are covered.
Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 11 10:55:48 EDT 2011 | diamondmt
Lou, Oh really? Why's that?
Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 03 15:14:58 EST 2015 | stevezeva
This is a late reply, but from my experience a really good removal station is one made by a company called CCRCo. They make a micro-abrasive station that addresses all the ESD concerns. They utilize a reusable media that is really cost effective. The
Electronics Forum | Thu Jan 30 15:41:52 EST 2003 | MikeF
The easy part is to determine which parts should be coated. The harder part is making sure the parts that should not be coated do not get coated. I don't even want to think about the amount of labor and materials I've lost due to conformal coat get
.gif)
winsouce.jpg)
