Electronics Forum | Fri Jun 25 13:00:48 EDT 2004 | haviland
Hi--We deal in used and recond. equipment in the Midwest, and have available a 1999 Amistar #7100FV w/ a nice complement of feeders, (6) pick up heads, rated component placement at 18,000 pph. Does .0402's, .3 BGA w/ 20 mil pitch, Full vision system,
Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 22 12:46:43 EDT 2007 | Hussman
Those Panasonic machines should be able to tell ya pick-up rates form the feeders and shape code errors (components it doesn't recognize). You will probably get a more pick-up errors than anything else. Most of this is due to plastic tape versus pa
Electronics Forum | Mon Dec 23 20:14:24 EST 2002 | vinhmach1
Hi, You can't void of loose parts. But can reduce. You can ask your Lead operator or the the person in charge for that individual line to keep track on the hourly monitor. If they tracking the number of PCB went thru the machine (getting the coun
Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 02 09:50:04 EST 2001 | stefwitt
Dave, I did assume Angela meant components ready for pick up. It would be too time consuming for any machine to measure the component availability prior to pick up. If we assume that the feeder advances in a rate of six sigma ( 3 defects per mio ) t
Electronics Forum | Sat Mar 04 13:28:53 EST 2017 | ttheis
Could also be the leads catching on the feeder or tray during pick-up. I just had a feeder catching the edge of a lead as the part was picked causing the part to shift and be rejected at severe rates.
Electronics Forum | Mon Jun 05 11:05:39 EDT 2006 | PWH
Our experience has been similar to yours. Not the best placements rates for 0603 caps. I can't tell you an exact reject rate on our machines. We program them as leaded components which seems to help a lot. Also, not using gang picks is best. You
Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 28 09:33:34 EDT 2003 | chrissieneale
This may be a really silly question but does anyone pick up and hand place the reject parts from the scrap bins of the machine? My attrition rates are out of control and i think this would not only highlight the problem but also save oodles of money
Electronics Forum | Sun Jun 18 13:15:57 EDT 2000 | Kevin Simpson
HI, We have placed with both Fuji Qp's and Universal Gsm's. We are running a small coil now on a Gsm with a sucessful rate.The Qp done well also, but the product is not ran on a Qp line, so no true production rate has been determined.I don't feel
Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 07 02:33:44 EST 2002 | cmay
I agree with Dave. The only reliable way is to perform a time study using a watch with decimal minutes. Setup the study using an average rated operator and time 10 component insertions (from pick up to hands off), time 10 component soldering operati
Electronics Forum | Tue Jun 04 16:12:41 EDT 2002 | Bob
The original profile had a higher ramp rate, and the apertures were 100%. The ramp rate is now much gentler and the addition of a small soak area around 160 � 170 degrees should burn off any excess flux. Appertures are now smaller and we get no leac
