Full Site - : sac305 vs lf354 (Page 6 of 7)

SACX vs. SN100C

Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 17 08:49:02 EDT 2006 | russ

Hi Paul, not to throw a wrench in here but I beleive that paople are talking about switching from SAC in wave to SN100C, NOT SACx, these are different. and should not be confused. SACx is supposed to fall somewhere in the middle of the SN100C and t

SN100C vs. SAC 305 wave soldering

Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 31 12:27:27 EST 2006 | Marcus

We have used the SN100C for over a year now with fanastic results. We use the SAC305 for SMT and SN100C wire exclusively. There are no problem mixing the alloys. I am also on the commitee for the NASA testing. The SN100C did out perform SAC and SnPb

SN100C vs. SAC 305 wave soldering

Electronics Forum | Wed Jan 04 08:32:21 EST 2006 | GS

HI aj, I suppose you have visited the Alphametal situ where they have plenty of information about SACX http://www.alphametals.com/main.asp For sure every one talks well about own products. I think the best judgement can be done from those who h

SN100C vs. SAC 305 wave soldering

Electronics Forum | Thu Jan 12 04:14:17 EST 2006 | Rob

The most prevailent wave solder machine in small to medium UK companies is the Blundell CMS400 - every man and his dog has one. And the recommended lead free solder for these machines is..... Greg's 0.3% Silver. Quite a few of our customers use h

SN100C vs. SAC 305 wave soldering

Electronics Forum | Wed Jan 18 17:17:52 EST 2006 | gregoryyork

Hi Rob You do not receive any benefit from me (I dont get any from my employers either) but if I knew who you were I would buy you a warm Guiness next time I saw you, or if you preffered a warm Bud I'm not fussy. You see its not difficult for compe

SAC105 vs. SAC305

Electronics Forum | Wed Sep 24 19:18:53 EDT 2008 | ratsalad

We had a PCB vendor provide us with SAC105 plated HASL boards. They worked fine on the first pass through reflow. The second pass was not pretty. We couldn't get much of anything to solder to the board. That may not have been the alloy, it could

SN100C vs. SAC 305 wave soldering

Electronics Forum | Wed Jan 11 18:44:42 EST 2006 | fctassembly

Hello Greg, Glad to hear your success with the SACX0307 copy. By the way, does the P mean it contains phosphorus? Does yours also contain bismuth like the SACX0307 (according to their plumbing solder patent for X0307)? In response to your discussion

SN100C vs. SAC 305 wave soldering

Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 10 14:44:42 EST 2006 | greg york

Not sure about Sn/Cu/Ni large market share here in Europe as we have a large part of the UK market with SACP0307 alloy 0.3%Ag introduced over Two years ago Also worked against Sn/Cu/Ni alloy with large TV Co and they went with 0.3%Ag due to reliabili

SACX vs. SN100C

Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 17 07:19:33 EDT 2006 | paulinct

I am also getting ready to order solder for my new wave. Based on what I have read (here and other places) people prefer Sn100c for the wave. I have yet to hear of someone using Sn100c and switching to SACx. I am using SAC305 for reflow and I am tryi

pad cratering

Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 01 13:17:39 EDT 2015 | davef

Cheryl Tulkoff and Randy Schueller do a good job summarizing the thinks on pad cratering here: http://www.smta.org/chapters/files/uppermidwest_padcratering.pdf Potential Mitigations to Pad Cratering * Board Redesign * Solder mask defined vs. non-s


sac305 vs lf354 searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information