Electronics Forum | Thu May 25 19:21:58 EDT 2006 | grantp
Hi, So that's really important to have a specific flux for lead free? We are looking at changing to SN100C after reading this thread and other stuff we have found, so can anyone recommend the best no clean flux for that metal? Do you need differen
Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 31 15:49:51 EST 2006 | GS
Hi Marcus, by using SN100C have you seen any tearing phenomena like what shown on the link ? http://www.smartgroup.org/pdf/Defect01.pdf Tnks Regards.........GS
Electronics Forum | Mon Jan 02 08:54:58 EST 2006 | aj
has anyone used or trialed the SACX from Alpha, from reportes and studies carried out it seems that its a go between SAC305 and SN100.
Electronics Forum | Fri Dec 30 10:12:27 EST 2005 | Cmiller
Joseph, thank you for your comments. Can I ask what kind of flux you are using?
Electronics Forum | Sun Jan 01 21:02:54 EST 2006 | sumxp
Please elaborate more on hole fill issue.How difficult to optimise the process para?
Electronics Forum | Wed Jan 04 17:06:20 EST 2006 | samir
All I can say about Alpha and their GOTT-DAMN website is THEY SUCK!! I refuse to register to view product literature... for that reason, Alpha Metals, you won't be looked at for my pb-free paste or bar solder evals.
Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 10 13:10:06 EDT 2006 | Marcus
No I have seen Zero hot tears. Thats with water soluble or No-Clean. We have built over 10,000 boards.
Electronics Forum | Thu May 25 18:59:12 EDT 2006 | Tony S.
We are using the Kester 979 with excellent results; the bonus is that it can be cleaned w/Di water.
Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 02 19:30:08 EST 2007 | Aquino
Yes, our company is also using SCS7 at the moment. Price is really cheap compared to all other solders. So far, we have been using it for about 1 1/2 years, no problem at all!
Electronics Forum | Thu Jan 19 23:29:29 EST 2006 | theSaint
I've seen many comments in many threads about the positive attributes of SN100C (apparently mostly by salesmen). However, I have a concern for the higher temps that will be encountered when using SN100C (or Sn/Cu) vs. SAC305 (vs. 63/37), specifica
