Electronics Forum | Fri Jan 20 09:58:48 EST 2006 | adlsmt
We are using SAC for reflow because of the lower temp and better wetting and copper disolution is not so much an issue in reflow. There is not much difference in the alloys and they can be mixed with no problems. I assume any supplier of SN100C cou
Electronics Forum | Thu Apr 06 17:42:59 EDT 2006 | GS
found this interesting comparison (SAC305 SN100C) http://www.nihonsuperior.co.jp/english/data/pdf/nse2_1.pdf Regards..........GS
Electronics Forum | Fri May 19 13:40:36 EDT 2006 | grantp
Hi, Sorry to drag this thread up again, but we were recommended to change the wave to SAC305, but is everyone recommending SN100C? That seems to be the feeling on this thread. What flux is used? Regards, Grant
Electronics Forum | Thu Dec 29 22:19:36 EST 2005 | Joseph
We have tested SN100C for LF wave soldering process since August'05 and currently start production for a month ago. Initially we use SAC305, but due to the shrinkage cavities (micro-crack) we changeover to SN100C. In summary, SN100C did perform well
Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 20 16:42:31 EST 2007 | ratsalad
We have been using SAC 305 for reflow and Cobalt 995 (very similar to SN100C, only cheaper) for wave and rework for quite a while now with no issues that I'm aware of.
Electronics Forum | Thu Jan 19 23:29:29 EST 2006 | theSaint
I've seen many comments in many threads about the positive attributes of SN100C (apparently mostly by salesmen). However, I have a concern for the higher temps that will be encountered when using SN100C (or Sn/Cu) vs. SAC305 (vs. 63/37), specifica
Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 17 07:19:33 EDT 2006 | paulinct
I am also getting ready to order solder for my new wave. Based on what I have read (here and other places) people prefer Sn100c for the wave. I have yet to hear of someone using Sn100c and switching to SACx. I am using SAC305 for reflow and I am tryi
Electronics Forum | Fri Dec 30 16:50:48 EST 2005 | fctassembly
250 tons/month) and, as it has been stated here, many customers have switched from SAC305 to SN100C but we are not aware of any customer who has switched from SN100C to SAC305. As the inventor of SN100C states, �once a customer touches the SN100C, he
Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 03 14:43:04 EST 2006 | amol_kane
the latest circuits assembly mazagine features an article on this by Karl Seelig
Electronics Forum | Thu Apr 06 18:22:53 EDT 2006 | russ
Anyone using the new SACX from Alpha?
winsouce.jpg)