Full Site - : stencil aperture for dpak (Page 10 of 14)

Solder Volume for Lower Profile PBGA

Electronics Forum | Fri Sep 30 17:26:56 EDT 2005 | GS

Have you already consulted IPC-7525 for stencil apertures? Regards GS

Re: Aperture Reduction for QFP (fine pitch)

Electronics Forum | Tue Sep 21 13:17:29 EDT 1999 | Dave F

snip | I've often been tempted to try something a little different when specifying QFP apertures. Like, for example, using long, tapered triangular apertures arranged in alternating directions. The objective being, get the maximum amount of paste do

Re: Aperture Reduction for QFP (fine pitch)

Electronics Forum | Tue Sep 21 04:00:27 EDT 1999 | Wolfgang Busko

| My stencil thickness is 6 mil and we got qfp's with fine pitch. | how many percent should i reduce my stencil aperture using a 6 mil stencil for 0.5 mm pitch and 0.4 mm pitch ? | | thanks | We use 6 mil lasercut stencils with 15% reduction and th

Re: Aperture Reduction for QFP (fine pitch)

Electronics Forum | Wed Sep 22 21:12:16 EDT 1999 | se

| | | | My stencil thickness is 6 mil and we got qfp's with fine pitch. | | | | how many percent should i reduce my stencil aperture using a 6 mil stencil for 0.5 mm pitch and 0.4 mm pitch ? | | | | | | | | thanks | | | | | | | We use 6 mil lasercu

Re: Stencil for 10 mils IC

Electronics Forum | Mon Nov 13 16:24:49 EST 2000 | Darby

Depending on the designers pad size, I generally go for 0.010" aperture with 0.010" spacing - stencil thickness 0.005". This combo with metal squeegees and the "usual suspects" of printer set up and placement details should you you hassle free.

Re: Aperture Reduction for QFP (fine pitch)

Electronics Forum | Tue Sep 21 17:24:58 EDT 1999 | John Thorup

| | | | My stencil thickness is 6 mil and we got qfp's with fine pitch. | | | | how many percent should i reduce my stencil aperture using a 6 mil stencil for 0.5 mm pitch and 0.4 mm pitch ? | | | | | | | | thanks | | | | | | | We use 6 mil lasercu

Stencil Design for Resistor Net Array 0402

Electronics Forum | Wed Mar 26 19:11:52 EST 2003 | russ

Tell us more about your printer. squegge blade type ,speed, snap-off distance etc... You shouldn't have to change apertures for any component based upon its rotation. the parts that are coming out good could they withstand a higher volume print? You

Re: Aperture Reduction for QFP (fine pitch)

Electronics Forum | Tue Sep 21 08:49:59 EDT 1999 | Chad Notebaert

| | My stencil thickness is 6 mil and we got qfp's with fine pitch. | | how many percent should i reduce my stencil aperture using a 6 mil stencil for 0.5 mm pitch and 0.4 mm pitch ? | | | | thanks | | | We use 6 mil lasercut stencils with 15% redu

Re: Stencil for 10 mils IC

Electronics Forum | Mon Nov 13 04:57:27 EST 2000 | Wolfgang Busko

Hi Richard, I assume that you deal with a component that has 20mil pitch. In this case depending on your pad design you get from 8 to 10mil spacing for your apertures. With a slight reduction of the aperture (10 to 15% for avoiding shorts)and a 6mil

Re: Aperture Reduction for QFP (fine pitch)

Electronics Forum | Wed Sep 22 22:23:55 EDT 1999 | SY

| | | | | My stencil thickness is 6 mil and we got qfp's with fine pitch. | | | | | how many percent should i reduce my stencil aperture using a 6 mil stencil for 0.5 mm pitch and 0.4 mm pitch ? | | | | | | | | | | thanks | | | | | | | | | We use 6


stencil aperture for dpak searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information