Electronics Forum | Fri Dec 11 09:46:39 EST 2009 | kjs123p
Here is a link that has a video of the different methods for attaching them and which is most reliable. http://www.screencast.com/users/beoleary/folders/7%20Ways%20to%20Profile%20for%20Profitability
Electronics Forum | Sun Oct 31 11:07:09 EDT 2010 | Mark
http://www.shanelo.co.za/Article%20to%20assist%20with%20Stencil%20Design%20Guidelines.htm Stencil design
Electronics Forum | Wed Feb 19 21:20:17 EST 2003 | davef
Consider: * http://www.ecd.com/Seminars/bobwillis.asp * http://www.assemblyonline.com/ Intro%20to%20Surface%20Mount%20Technology%20T&CF.doc * http://www.smta.org/ * http://www.rayprasad.com/training.html * http://www.omnitraining.com * http://ww
Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 03 20:21:26 EDT 2002 | alex_kirichenko
Thanks for responding..... The question I was trying to ask is if U appetures are mechanicaly strong, if the tab in the middle won't stik up and damage squeegee blades? I never had stencil with such appeturs. We are just about to start some trials
Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 18 09:05:54 EDT 2017 | davef
Acceptability of Electronic Assemblies IPC-A-610 F Comparison E to F versions * http://www.electronicsyorkshire.org.uk/UserFiles/PDFs/610E%20to%20F%20Redline%20comparison.pdf * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kD5NpsocTpw * http://www.scanditron.c
Electronics Forum | Mon Jun 07 17:58:12 EDT 2004 | Rob
UPDATE: Just for fun... I sacrificed a scrapped board to determine what remained and what fell and this is the result. Board dimension was 18"x9" and .9" thick. Components consist of hundreds of passives plus 386 proc (QFP256), TSOPs, SOLs 14/16/20,
Electronics Forum | Fri Sep 22 13:15:19 EDT 2006 | jaimebc
We are currently experiencing some MCSB's on 0603 components. I am looking into experimenting with the stencil thickness from 6 mil to 5 mil and also using Radiused inverted homeplate ( 20%60%20)to eliminate or reduced this problem. We are using lea
| 1 |
