Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 25 14:20:57 EDT 2000 | PFA
I believe that the standard taping is 44x32
Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 25 03:30:26 EDT 2000 | gary
We got PLCC 68 components on our new products and we are not sure on what feeder pitch we are going to use for the said part as we do not have 44mm feeders. Can anyone there help me what feeders are they using for the said parts so we won't end up bu
Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 25 20:36:08 EDT 2000 | Jason
What type of machine are you placing the PLCC68 with? We place PLCC84 on a Fuji QP242 and we use Hover-Davis electronic feeders. They are expensive but worth the money as you can change the pitch to many setting as long as the width remains the sam
Electronics Forum | Mon Mar 09 11:43:59 EDT 2009 | pcbrown
Here is a formula that may help. C/P C= Component's weight in grams P= Total pad area in Sq. in. Must be less than or equal to 30 Parts larger than a 68 pin PLCC should use an adhesive. Hope this helps.
Electronics Forum | Fri Jul 26 05:14:38 EDT 2013 | anilw2006
We had a solder joint problem in gold plated PLCC68 ic. We do double sided reflow process with Cookson OL107F paste. First we do top with paste and second with glue process.The solder joint shape and wetting looked normal.In the process of testing
Electronics Forum | Tue Dec 06 21:48:26 EST 2005 | davef
We thought Bob Willis posted something like that a few years ago, but can't find it [real quick. Maybe someone more patient can.] Anyway, a PLCC68 weighs 4.67gm. On various PLCC size dropping or not: * upto 52 will stay put * 84 will drop
Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 25 23:28:06 EDT 2000 | gary
our equipment is Universal GSM1. we can't afford the price of a 44 mm multi pitch feeder from universal that's why we are planning to settle with the fixed pitch feeder. thanks
Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 26 07:40:37 EDT 2000 | JAX
gary, If you know who you are buying the parts from( who is your vendor), you can either log on to there web site and find the packaging specs or contact them and ask. All you need is the manufacturing number of the part, and your purchasing group
Electronics Forum | Thu Apr 22 01:47:28 EDT 1999 | Larry Johnson
Recently, we have been having problems with PLCC's passing vision on our IP's If the part is set up to be placed on Head 2, it will not always pass vision. However, if we move it over to Head 1, it will pass and place just fine. Now, I do realize
Electronics Forum | Wed Apr 28 00:58:22 EDT 1999 | Will B. Caught
| Recently, we have been having problems with PLCC's passing vision on our IP's If the part is set up to be placed on Head 2, it will not always pass vision. However, if we move it over to Head 1, it will pass and place just fine. Now, I do realiz
