Electronics Forum | Tue Nov 01 14:46:31 EDT 2011 | davef
Agilent TestJet Technology White Paper In the early 1990s, the testing of digital parts became problematical. Previous in-circuit test techniques sought to ensure a correct, functioning part by applying digital patterns, called vectors, to the input
Electronics Forum | Wed Dec 06 11:11:37 EST 2006 | devgru
Just my two cents, but our findings were that the Yestech system was more in-line with our type of high mix, mid volume manufacturing. In my research, I found the Yestech to be the most favored for our applications, with most contract shops I talked
Electronics Forum | Mon Feb 18 17:27:03 EST 2002 | hgwells
Agilent has a great article on determining whether automated optical inspection (AOI) or automated x-ray inspection (AXI) is right for you. It's a PDF file that can found here: http://www.ate.agilent.com/EMT/LIBRARY/X-RAY/DOCS/59883661en.pdf To sum
Electronics Forum | Mon Mar 29 12:10:14 EDT 2010 | rway
Test Jet will work for catching lifted leads, certainly. X-ray is the only thing for testing for internal solder defects such as voids and cracks. I personally do not have any experience using X-ray, so I cannot advise on its reliability. Perhaps
Electronics Forum | Tue May 04 15:18:45 EDT 2004 | msjohnston1
Ricardo makes some good points. My idea of a dream line is one that flexible to run as a high mix/low vol and low mix/high vol. I personally like Dek printers over MPM. The new printers from Mulara look interesting but they are a new company with a
| 1 |
