Electronics Forum | Fri Jul 19 13:05:56 EDT 2002 | pjc
It has been release by Mydata. I haven't used it yet.
Electronics Forum | Mon Dec 23 20:17:44 EST 2002 | davef
Search the fine SMTnet Archives for background descussion.
Electronics Forum | Wed Apr 09 15:05:45 EDT 2003 | russ
Probably of no help but here it is anyway This is a tuff one. Attrition is due to many factors. You have machine rejects (visual fail, no pick), feeder set-up loss each time a reel is removed you lose X number of parts depending on feeder design (w
Electronics Forum | Fri Nov 07 03:50:05 EST 2003 | chrissieneale
Rocky, i would be interested, do you want to email me them direct?
Electronics Forum | Tue Apr 06 14:44:50 EDT 2004 | davef
Chris Search the SMTnet Archives to get started. There's a fair amount of background there.
Electronics Forum | Wed Sep 13 22:29:10 EDT 2006 | davef
attrition
Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 23 22:59:30 EDT 2007 | fastek
Couldn't agree more Old Dude
Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 06 10:55:58 EST 2001 | pjc
Larry, Our specification is 0.075% for our Fuji CP3 and IP2 machines. At or above that figure the Maintenance Dept. has to get to work. We typically see 0.03% to 0.05% on average. The Fuji machines are all vision centering. We have found feeders are
Electronics Forum | Mon Dec 23 13:44:46 EST 2002 | Paul Black
Does anyone have a tried-and-true method to account for machine losses of SMT parts? I remember reading an article once that stated that 5% - 10% of components of certain sizes are known to be lost during placement, and I know some CM's overplan by 5
Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 28 09:33:34 EDT 2003 | chrissieneale
This may be a really silly question but does anyone pick up and hand place the reject parts from the scrap bins of the machine? My attrition rates are out of control and i think this would not only highlight the problem but also save oodles of money
