Electronics Forum | Tue Nov 28 09:21:58 EST 2006 | Michael Sanders
Is anyone aware of any articles, white papers, etc., that discuss the gap between the lead and the pad after a SM joint is soldered? In particular, I am looking for a formula for that "gap" for various components.
Electronics Forum | Tue Nov 28 20:12:41 EST 2006 | davef
We don't have a gap between the lead and the pad after a SM joint is soldered. On our boards, this space is filled with the solder intended to attach the component to the board. How high do components sit above the surface of a board? Most people a
Electronics Forum | Tue Nov 28 09:37:39 EST 2006 | GS
Have you seen IPC-A-610 D ? regards GS
Electronics Forum | Tue Nov 28 15:41:51 EST 2006 | realchunks
Try IPC-SM-782.
Electronics Forum | Tue Jun 07 20:17:09 EDT 2022 | SMTA-64387182
Understood, Thanks, Joe
Electronics Forum | Wed Nov 29 11:46:57 EST 2006 | slthomas
IPC 610 *C* states that the solder thickness requirement is a properly wetted termination is evident. Fillet height is another aspect and is usually specific to the package but is some function of solder thickness plus a percentage of lead height. D
Electronics Forum | Thu Dec 09 15:19:21 EST 2004 | nrocco
Can anyone point me in the direction to find some IPC standards for lead free solder joint reliablity tests, such as shear tests, pull tests, vibe tests, enviroment tests, etc. I need to know what the specs. are on all aspects of reliability and how
Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 30 16:14:33 EST 2006 | darby
Maybe ask your customer where they got this idea from? It is possible they may have even got this idea from some white paper or article where they are trying to explain something else and show drawings with no solder between the pad and lead. It may
Electronics Forum | Wed Nov 29 20:30:22 EST 2006 | davef
Your customer is so poorly educated that you should decline their work, because this will not be the last time they waste your time with their cockamamey theories.
Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 30 14:49:54 EST 2006 | M. Sanders
Dave, Thanks - I couldn't agree with you more. Unfortunately, our "bean counters" have a different frame of mind.
