Electronics Forum | Thu Oct 23 07:09:02 EDT 2014 | headlad
Just curious. We use these machines and software > in our facility and I am looking for others that > ideas can be bounced off of when needed....and > trust me, we need it frequently. Hi, We use PT100 and 200 for our CM202, CM402 and CM101 line
Electronics Forum | Tue Dec 02 06:44:59 EST 2014 | cbeneat
Here's what I found online, 602 Placement accuracy ±40µm/chip (Cpk1) If you need the flexibility to switch from ultrahigh-speed placement to multi-functionality on site, the CM402 high-speed interchangeable platform, modular placement machine is the
Electronics Forum | Wed Dec 09 17:22:09 EST 2015 | tombstonesmt
I couldn't be more pleased with Panasonic. We've upgraded from MPAV's and MSR's to CM602/DT401 and now their NPM platform. NPM's are extremely fast and accurate. Their auto pickup position teach is great especially if you're running any 0402 2mm pit
Electronics Forum | Wed Mar 21 13:39:11 EDT 2018 | tombstonesmt
I know this isn't a choice from what I'm reading, but we use to kill LED boards with an old Panasonic MSR. Our newer CM-602 and NPM could not beat the speed when you're talking about a max of 3 different part numbers; depending on binning. My .02 .
Electronics Forum | Wed Nov 26 15:01:07 EST 2014 | dhollland
No, guess I should have tried to explain it better. If I am trying to place a component at X-31.6 and Y52.8 What is the tolerance +/- that the machine will put it at that exact location. I know it's not going to place it at exactly that spot every
.gif)
winsouce.jpg)