Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 23 23:59:25 EST 2000 | terry sun
Hello to all out there, We're considering CC process,and would like to know some defferences between SSC3 of Electrolube and Humiseal 1B73, yes,I know that SSC3 is silicone one,and Humiseal 1B73 is solvent based acrylic as well as other basic propert
Electronics Forum | Wed Dec 02 00:31:37 EST 2009 | jlawson
UV40 for you info was developed in Humiseal EU and has been tested heavily against Dymax product. UV40 is a great product has many approvals from major auto and whitegoods makers.... I have seen comparisons UV40 to Dymax 984LV and Dymax comes out se
Electronics Forum | Wed Mar 24 15:04:05 EST 1999 | Greg Curler
I am looking into replacing another business division's Acrylic coating process with our Urethane coating process. Unfortunately, MIL-I-46068 doesn't differentiate AR/UR's performance, and the MFR data sheets don't match up at all (they each spec di
Electronics Forum | Wed Mar 24 21:40:05 EST 1999 | Dave F
| I am looking into replacing another business division's Acrylic coating process with our Urethane coating process. Unfortunately, MIL-I-46068 doesn't differentiate AR/UR's performance, and the MFR data sheets don't match up at all (they each spec
Electronics Forum | Fri Aug 30 16:25:21 EDT 2002 | davef
Imm silver holds-up to multiple thermal cycles very well. The things, we guess, are happening to make imm silver tough to solder after heating and sitting are: * Oxidation of the silver. * Reduction of the co-deposited organic anti-tarnish [used in
Electronics Forum | Tue Aug 26 15:39:49 EDT 2008 | kpm135
I am not positive about this but I have been told that you cannot use acrylic and urethane coatings in systems that have had silicone run through them. It was explained to me that you can never fully get the silicone out of the existing system and th
Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 25 19:19:08 EST 1999 | Graham Naisbitt
| I am looking into replacing another business division's Acrylic coating process with our Urethane coating process. Unfortunately, MIL-I-46068 doesn't differentiate AR/UR's performance, and the MFR data sheets don't match up at all (they each spec
Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 26 13:02:18 EST 1999 | Scott McKee
Sorry, in the following message I'm agreeing with Graham - not Greg... | | I am looking into replacing another business division's Acrylic coating process with our Urethane coating process. Unfortunately, MIL-I-46068 doesn't differentiate AR/UR's p
Electronics Forum | Mon Mar 29 04:36:49 EST 1999 | Graham Naisbitt
Just for the record folks, The customer I believe may be manufacturing stuff for refuelling rigs of various forms. This being the case, the coating would need to be resistant against fuels and oils. The UR material (at least ours!) is able to resi
Electronics Forum | Mon Mar 29 19:17:47 EST 1999 | Scott McKee
How true, AR would not be the right choice... Scott | Just for the record folks, | | The customer I believe may be manufacturing stuff for refuelling rigs of various forms. | | This being the case, the coating would need to be resistant against f
.gif)
