Electronics Forum: component reject (Page 1 of 20)

un-tested assembled circuit reject rates

Electronics Forum | Tue Dec 07 13:40:25 EST 1999 | Tim

The company I represent provides electronic manufacturing services. Some of my customers ask that we ship their boards "un-tested". By un-tested I mean we build them, visually inspect them and out they go. I find that on un-tested boards, it's not

Re: un-tested assembled circuit reject rates

Electronics Forum | Tue Dec 07 14:21:41 EST 1999 | Brian W.

In my experience, the most commonly accepted theory is that 100% inspection is only 80% effective AT BEST. That means that if your inspoectors are happy, noy outside concerns, well-rested, etc, they will catch 80% of the defects. This number goes d

Re: reject percentage of assembled circuits after initial test?

Electronics Forum | Fri Jan 08 13:22:11 EST 1999 | Earl Moon

| This is a question for those of you who actually assemble components onto a board. | Any idea what the "industry standard" is for fall out on assembled PCB's? I realize that the controls put in place in your processes will effect your overall qua

Re: reject percentage of assembled circuits after initial test?

Electronics Forum | Fri Jan 08 21:46:49 EST 1999 | Dean

| | This is a question for those of you who actually assemble components onto a board. | | Any idea what the "industry standard" is for fall out on assembled PCB's? I realize that the controls put in place in your processes will effect your overall

reject percentage of assembled circuits after initial test?

Electronics Forum | Fri Jan 08 10:11:15 EST 1999 | Tim

This is a question for those of you who actually assemble components onto a board. Any idea what the "industry standard" is for fall out on assembled PCB's? I realize that the controls put in place in your processes will effect your overall quality

Re: reject percentage of assembled circuits after initial test?

Electronics Forum | Mon Jan 11 18:07:55 EST 1999 | Lech Bartnik

| | | This is a question for those of you who actually assemble components onto a board. | | | Any idea what the "industry standard" is for fall out on assembled PCB's? I realize that the controls put in place in your processes will effect your ove

0402 (1005) component

Electronics Forum | Thu Apr 28 08:12:39 EDT 2005 | PL

My company is just starting run 0402 component but the 0402 component giving lot of reject example overturn and pickup miss error so anyone know how to soft this problem Machine Type:-Pansert MV2F 1)machine already inspection 2)already test new f

Soldering Issue in Sensor component

Electronics Forum | Fri Dec 27 12:47:21 EST 2019 | ameenullakhan

Dear Team, We are facing open solder issue in a sensor component. Rejection rate is 2 out of 50 components placed. The issue is very random. We have tried increasing the solder paste height from 5 mil to 7 mil. The issue persist still. Differen

Increasing size tolerance to reduce component rejection

Electronics Forum | Mon Sep 26 18:53:30 EDT 2016 | chabscan

Could it be possible in my Quad 4c, to increase component size tolerance to reduce the rejection of components? Could this have an impact in the event of the machine picking a component off center? As in if the machine picks a compnent off center but

Increasing size tolerance to reduce component rejection

Electronics Forum | Tue Sep 27 11:43:32 EDT 2016 | tnisbet

Yes you can open the tolerance, and that’ll usually work for a bit. Is the LAE is linked to multiple parts? If so, then the easiest thing is to open the tolerance. If not, that’ll require another route to try. Is it happening to all of the components

  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next

component reject searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information

Electronics Equipment Consignment

High Precision Fluid Dispensers
Void Free Reflow Soldering

World's Best Reflow Oven Customizable for Unique Applications
design with ease with Win Source obselete parts and supplies

"Heller Korea"