Electronics Forum | Wed Feb 16 17:28:14 EST 2005 | davef
Greg: As we understand it, in your situation: * One 0805 lead solders to board properly * Another 0805 lead does not solder On the 0805 lead does not solder, there does the solder go? * On the pad * On the component lead A common solderability test
Electronics Forum | Wed Jun 21 08:53:25 EDT 2006 | stepheniii
Are you worried the terminations might b oxidized? Do a dip test. If you have a solder pot carefully dip one termination of the cap into the solder. And see how well it wets. If that test doesn't satify the powers that be, then you can design a more
Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 09 13:01:17 EST 2007 | stepheniii
Not unless it's a case of "the only difference is..." What I mean by that is more than once I've been told the only difference in a new rev is one component or one change. But the truth was that was the only reason for the change, and in fact there
Electronics Forum | Wed Feb 16 14:50:46 EST 2005 | Valerie
You could have a supplier problem. We had a similiar problem with one of our capacitor suppliers. I would suggest doing a solderability test on the component right out of the tape.
Electronics Forum | Thu Aug 29 18:28:19 EDT 2002 | Dreamsniper
Semi conductor devices last for 5-10 years or more when in use. Since those parts are in stock and are not in use they are considered in good condition. The only concern that you got is how will you process them. We had the same problem before and it
Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 09 22:33:45 EST 2007 | Guest
Dear AJ, Try removing shield ,test it, verify if it would perform as the previous runs . If not, there maybe something wrong with device or as one of our collegue mentioned that there is possibilty the your customer change some components.If the
Electronics Forum | Thu Aug 29 17:45:54 EDT 2002 | nifhail
What are other testing/process step that we should do if we where to use the old date code QFPs other than solderability and baking ? What is the plating composition normally %? lead, % tin etc. I have my policy not to accept the more than 12 mont
Electronics Forum | Thu Jun 26 14:23:37 EDT 2014 | davx
Thanks for the hint. Managed to identify it easier with the codebook, it turned out to be a Phillips A6p Fast acting switching diode. Luckily I found a A6t (same but made in tiawan), tested to see if the forward current drop was the same and rework
Electronics Forum | Thu Apr 28 08:12:39 EDT 2005 | PL
My company is just starting run 0402 component but the 0402 component giving lot of reject example overturn and pickup miss error so anyone know how to soft this problem Machine Type:-Pansert MV2F 1)machine already inspection 2)already test new f
Electronics Forum | Tue Apr 11 15:37:31 EDT 2006 | stockley
(Hey Cal how you doing?) I can't resist this. You can sort of do what you're hoping for but you have to be very careful. Let the component run out and let the machine get as far as it's going to go. Then go to "Software Options", "Test commands" then