Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 17 19:35:38 EDT 2001 | Anonymous
John, You realize the DT-651 machine from Fuji will allow you to do CP and CPk data as well as calibrate your feeders. Something to think about.
Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 04 12:22:07 EDT 2001 | davef
Several points: * Consider that your Cpk is probably different for both placing large and small components. * Probably your routine placement rate SB the speed you use to monitor the accuracy of your process. * Some people use a calibrated glass test
Electronics Forum | Fri Feb 29 09:51:39 EST 2008 | iantech
Guys I am trying to measure the placement repeatabilty of my placement machines, and I was wondering if you guys had any usefull excell tools you have developed along the way that might help me input the figures so my bosses can understand ian.
Electronics Forum | Wed Oct 21 01:46:57 EDT 1998 | Daniel
We currently using the Panasert SMT machine where PCB flow direction were from right to left, & we are planning to move in the FUJI -CP3 & CP4-2 in line where standard PCB flow direction were left to right. Any comment on FUJI machine modification of
Electronics Forum | Wed Mar 08 22:20:11 EST 2006 | pmperreca
I was wondering what type of machine would be the best for high production rate of small pcb boards. A rate of somewhere near 800,000 units a month on a board that is approx 1"x2" 4layer with 20 components.
Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 09 12:09:19 EST 2006 | fastek
I assumed a conservative 25,000 cph for each of the chipshooters...whether it's an MV2F, CP-6, CP-642 etc. You're not going to get 50,000 cph out of (1) CP-643. You might for short periods but not in the long run. It would be suicide to rely on one
Electronics Forum | Wed Mar 08 23:40:43 EST 2006 | fastek
If......... 1) Assuming you are panelizing them (you would have to actually).... 2) You don't have any fine pitch parts on the board then I would suggest a chipshooter like a Fuji CP-6 or a Panasonic MV2F. Get (2) of these used for around $100K ea
Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 09 00:45:57 EST 2006 | kent_peterson
Fastek will get it done with 2 machine and 2 shifts. 2 shifts would need to place 50,000cph. One CP643 with both device tables set could get it done. Having it panelized in 50's, you would need to print 50 panels a hour so get a auto cleaner on the p
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 14 04:25:20 EST 2006 | Rob
I wouldn't go with the AX-5 - it's overkill. To make a board in high volume that sounds that simple is a job for a second user chipshooter (Fuji or Pana)as the first reply mentioned. Stay away from FCM1's. I'm sure the AX-5 is a great machine, but
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 14 03:57:43 EST 2006 | Base
Hey Peter, Did some simple math... 800.000PCB's x 20cmp = 1.6million placements 8hrs/day * 22 days/month = 176 hrs You're looking at over 90kCph fulltime! I'd say go with an AX-5 as JAX suggested. Given the product you described you could reach s
