Electronics Forum | Tue Jun 11 06:43:28 EDT 2002 | pjc
If your goal is to inspect solder joints then X-ray is the way to go. AOI is not effective at solder joint and is best at component inspection. Using an AXI or AOI for solder joint inspection requires a lot of engineering time. Don't know any good si
Electronics Forum | Fri Aug 07 08:39:16 EDT 2009 | rway
Hello Karkanov, Have you looked into YesTech? I dont' know where your located, but their support is really good for their systems. People have also mentioned Mirtec and speak highly of this company as well. Do a search for either on this forum an
Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 10 09:47:39 EDT 2001 | vance66
Has anyone seen any reductions in printing defects due to the use of a Volumetric LSM? What are the pros and cons to Cyberoptics LSM 300?
Electronics Forum | Thu Jul 12 21:57:18 EDT 2001 | mugen
Finally someone with great sense of what needs to be done! and wonderful sense of where we need to go.... If 2D was sufficient, HE would have made this physical world of ours 2D too.... (tongue twister, nay...) I agree fully with this Steve guy, 10
Electronics Forum | Thu Jul 12 17:43:50 EDT 2001 | Steve
In order to understand your printing process, you cannot rely soley on 2D inspection. By implementing 3D-true volumetric measurement, a more comprehensive approach to correcting the process variation can be established. True volumetric / 3D inspect
Electronics Forum | Tue May 03 07:18:01 EDT 2011 | dontfeedphils
I've dealt with YesTech, Mirtech, and most recently CyberOptics, and so far my favorite is without a doubt the CyberOptics. The Yestech (pattern match) is very easy to program and use but it took sooooo much up-keep to keep the false calls to a mana
Electronics Forum | Tue May 03 21:20:58 EDT 2011 | littlebone
Exactly. And now a day, we are sourcing quite a number of alternative component. (e.g. IC, capacitor...) Template matching may took long time to calibrate the variances too. Desperate to look for cyberoptics representative to have a presentation
Electronics Forum | Mon Dec 05 20:44:14 EST 2011 | littlebone
Anyone try Cyberoptics SAM technology before? My company do not have so many talent engineers to handle algorithm tuning :( What to do?
Electronics Forum | Fri Dec 16 01:25:35 EST 2011 | AAAA
Hi, We are using CyberOptics Flex Ultra for 7 years, and believe me it requires a lot of time to create and tune up the programs. In my opinion, this machine is not suitable for high mix low volume production. Also we have Omron AOI, which is algor
Electronics Forum | Fri Apr 29 05:45:28 EDT 2011 | littlebone
We can find quite a few number of Pros/Cons on Template matching vs Algorithm Based. But this morning I have explored a new technology on "Cyber Optic" AOI. The technology called "SAM" (Statistical Appearance Modelling). As long as your manufactur