Electronics Forum | Wed Apr 02 14:44:43 EDT 2014 | Sid U.
Hi All, I am looking at new X-ray systems and have shortlisted the Nordson Dage XD7600NT (Ruby) and the Nikon XTV160 (Revolution). I would greatly appreciate it if somebody can highlight the pros and cons of each? My concerns are software usability
Electronics Forum | Wed Apr 02 19:28:06 EDT 2014 | rboguski
We have had a Dage XD7600NT Ruby for about two years. We were one of the first in North America to purchase it with the X-Plane Technology. We concur with the previous post that it is primarily a manual system. Dage offers step-and-repeat features
Electronics Forum | Fri Apr 18 11:31:20 EDT 2014 | rboguski
We've experienced the same thing: Customers bring a board to us suspecting a certain problem, only to find, after Xplane analysis by us, that the defect is different or lies elsewhere.
Electronics Forum | Wed Apr 02 15:29:26 EDT 2014 | emeto
Hello, as we are talking about X-ray, I don't think you can do maintenance on your own unless you are specially trained in X-ray applications. Dage(we have Dage) offers maintenance as well as tube warranty but it not cheap. In terms of programming y
Electronics Forum | Thu Apr 17 13:30:30 EDT 2014 | anvil1021
in our opinion unless the Nikon machine has a solution to the Xplane ability to use Tomosynthesis there is a huge difference in the 2 machines. Xplane is a huge quality enabler and we have people beating our door down to get us to look at their perce
Electronics Forum | Thu Apr 03 17:39:37 EDT 2014 | siddharth
You are correct. Both the machines are "semi-automatic". The program can focus on the part you want to inspect and perform basic inspections like void analysis (BGA, QFP) etc. But you have to manually navigate and look for defects like TH solder fill
Electronics Forum | Thu Apr 03 17:50:53 EDT 2014 | rboguski
We use it almost exclusively in manual mode for PCBA failure analysis. Our main purpose is to find head-in-pillow defects; secondarily incomplete wetting of ball to substrate. In two years of almost continuous use we have only had occasion to use t
| 1 |
.gif)
.gif)
