Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 18 14:00:25 EDT 2008 | rrpowers
There are 2 reasons for wanting to change to an enclosed print system: - Reduce solder paste usage. (We run a high volume application so any reduction in paste scrap is a big money saver to our company.) - Improved print quality. (Ours is a non-rew
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 18 15:48:03 EDT 2008 | tds
Give Scott or Dick Wilson a call @ 330-724-3333.
Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 20 18:39:30 EDT 2008 | cmckissick
I am not a big believer in these systems, unless you are doing a no-clean, multi-shift operation with minimum changeover. If you are a small batch shop, the amount of solder paste you end up wasting can actually be the same or more, if you are not r
Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 20 20:57:44 EDT 2008 | rrpowers
Well, we are in fact doing a no-clean, multi-shift, very high volume, minimal changeover operation. We use up any paste long before it gets old. Because of the sheer volume any reduction in paste scrap for us is big money. We also are in a zero de
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 18 13:18:04 EDT 2008 | realchunks
I guess one question is why go to this system? Not because it's out dated, but why do you feel the need to go with this type of process?
Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 20 08:46:21 EDT 2008 | mefloump
You can also try Omni-Tronics, Inc. (763) 425-2675. This is who we purchase parts from for our Paste Puck.
Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 27 05:49:33 EDT 2008 | ianlg
Hi If you still want to gp down the Paste Puck route then Reprint Limited has an ex Demo Paste Pucj system available available. http://www.reprintservices.co.uk/Screen_Printer_Availability_Listing.html
Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 07 15:40:05 EDT 2008 | pjc
Pump print heads do not print better. Blades print faster and better quality than pump print heads.
Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 07 17:54:10 EDT 2008 | pjc
yes, should have said "studies have shown"... as they do. if not, all would be using pump print heads on our DEKs and MPMs that can take them, aye?
