Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 22 06:47:43 EST 2005 | bobpan
Is anyone out there using V 6.6 OLP to balance the line for a couple of QSA-30 machines. I am thinking of doing it but need to dig up an old computer with windows 95 and just wondered if anyone was doing it or if it was worth the trouble. Thanks
Electronics Forum | Tue May 22 18:53:21 EDT 2012 | swag
If your washing them in-line, heavy silicon mesh works good in cages to keep them from flying around.
Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 08 22:48:58 EST 2008 | davef
Maybe these folk can help you with your MTM issues. http://www.mtm.org We appreciate the desire to balance the line with respect to standard insertion time, number of insertions, and number of assemblers. In reality there are too many variables fo
Electronics Forum | Sat Jun 19 02:12:44 EDT 2004 | vinitverma
I feel the TopazXIIs or the Opal XIIs (both from Assembleon) should be the perfect fit with low cost and high productivity/capability/flexibility. Regards Vinit
Electronics Forum | Mon Jan 07 09:25:55 EST 2008 | pjc
One per operator is the optimum for obvious. 3 to 4 per operator is more typical. The number is not as important as the type and time. Like don't have someone handle 2 different TO92 part nrs., splitting them up to different operators eliminates the
Electronics Forum | Mon Feb 14 05:59:42 EST 2000 | Drew
I would suggest contacting some refurb companies depending on how much volume you are talking about. From my experience, I would look at Fuji (very good equipment), Seimens (flexibility) or something like MYDATA. Fuji's tend to run towards the high e
Electronics Forum | Mon Jan 10 18:50:24 EST 2011 | eadthem
We have 2 universal instruments lines 1 with 120spindle and 11 spindle and another with 30 and 7 spindle. our old line was the 120 and the 7. I was wondering if anyone knows of a easy way or a program that can merge runfiles from 2 or 3 machines so
Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 06 08:32:20 EST 2020 | SMTA-Ken
Volume dictates throughput required. High-Volume = Requires redundant processes, Two Lines. Mid-Volume = Dual Lane or Two Lines. Low-Volume = Single Line. So Mid-Volume is the only volume scenario that a case for dual lane could be made. Dual Lane :
Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 05 03:01:06 EST 2020 | leo_dektec
Hello toki, The only factor you need to consider is the production yield. If the volume is really high, need two smt line to run continually to meet the production, then u have no choice. If the volume is not that much, then u can consider below smt
Electronics Forum | Thu Dec 09 21:56:30 EST 2021 | dwl
my two cents is double sided lines aren't worth the trouble if you are low volume/high mix. As others have said, balancing this is a nightmare. There are tradeoffs, of course. You will build up WIP, and this is especially problematic if there are MSD
